search for: simoes

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

Morning, Well I ordered a Windows Server 2008 Standard for a need around here and after just spending an hour with Dell support (nice fellow, not his fault) I find that now the 2008 Server is too *new* for the Samba NT4 PDC model. I got this box joined fine with my domain, but any time I try to log into it over RDP, and the new box authenticates with samba (and samba talks to OpenLDAP) the box

Is then new idmap_ad module capable of getting uid/gid info from a Windows 2003 AD pre-R2 with RFC2307 Unix Identity Mapping Extensions applied? Also, is the correct syntax for specifying the schema_mode as follows: idmap config dom.example.com:schema_mode = rfc2307 (I am not confident that I am reading the idmap_ad manpage and the new idmap document correctly.) Thanks for the help, Murthy

Racer X, The simple answer I have; No Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -----Original Message----- From: Racer X [mailto:racer_x_0x0@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:27 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org; Robert Adkins Subject: [Samba] Password protect shares without creating user accounts Hi, Could you tell

Has anyone on this list been able to configure samba in such a way so that it will authenticate to windows 2K acitve directory. What I want to do is this: install samba 2.2.7 onto a Redhat linux 7.3 system, then configure samba (I think using something called smb_pam) so that it will join the windows active directory domain. Is such a thing possible? Has anyone here done it? I can't find

Dear users, I have uploaded the new 3.0.25a packages compiled for sarge. At the same time I have removed older 2.2.x and 3.0.x packages for Woody. Support for back porting packages to Woody was already discontinued, but older packages were still provided. As these packages were not updated after the recent security issues, I decided to remove them to avoid pushing people to use outdated and

Hi, I'm trying to import categorical data from SPSS to R using the script: xxx <-spss.get("xxx.por", use.value.labels=TRUE) but unfortunately am getting an error message 'error reading portable-file dictionary'. I have successfully imported data in the past. What could be the problem with this data? Thanks Simo

Dear List, I am wanting to perform some traffic shaping as the subject of this email suggests. What I am wanting to do is this; I would like to have traffic shaping performed on the following protocols: HTTP, RDP, GRE, PPTP, SIP and IAX. Obviously I would like to have highest priority set for voice packets so much so that the general http traffic does not impede on the voice packets. I

Ok, the file definition was missing. Now i''ve put that: ## services/ssh.pp class ssh { file { sshd_config: name => "/etc/ssh/sshd_config" } service { ssh: name => $operatingsystem ? { Debian => ssh, default => sshd }, ensure =>

I happened to check if there are current Debian .deb packages for 3.0.20a at samba.org, only 3.0.14a in the directory. Will this be updated, or has there been a change in operations behind the scenes? Thanks! -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.

I am somewhat confused... I understand that the preferred method to mount a Samba share with a Linux client is to use "mount -t cifs" rather than "mount -t smbfs". I get the impression that smbfs is samba.org developed code where as cifs is from elsewhere. Thus the point of confusion. Why is samba.org not developing the preferred code in this case? A sub question to that

I recently joined a samba 3.0.22 server to AD. When I did the kinit, the AD gave me a 24 hour ticket with a 1 week renewal. Setting -r and -l to 365d did not change anything, the ticket still came back the same. However, my question is in reguard to whether this is really even needed? First, I deleted the ticket, and everything seemed to continue to work perfectly. Now, I let the ticket expire

Hi! I'm trying to convert my tdb-based idmap mapping to a LDAP-based one. This generally works as intended, with one exception - the highest uidNumber/gidNumber in use is not transferred, and this causes duplicate use of the same uid/gidNumber. Here's what I'm doing: 1) net idmap dump /var/cache/samba/winbindd_idmap.tdb > idmap.dump 2) Set idmap backend in smb.conf to

Hi, I am new to this list and to the world of Linux so please forgive my basic knowledge. I am after some information regarding samba. We are running a few servers with RedHat 7.1 all with dual nics. One NIC of each goes to a level 3 routing switch on one network and the second NIC in each server goes out to different networks. We have a few Windows 95 machine that

I've uploaded 3.0.21a packages for sarge. They will be available as soon as mirrors catch up. Have fun. Simo.

Hello mailing list, I don´t know how to use HFSC queuing discipline with tcng configuration language. I become always this error: syntax error near "hfsc" Is it possible, that tcng provides no support for this classful hfcs queuing discipline? Please help! thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, I'm trying to setup a PDC with Samba, but I have the known problem of the roaming profiles: big files. I think it's difficult to guarantee that a inexperienced user will copy is downloaded files, documents, or whatever, to a H:\ share instead of is handy desktop. Other problem is the files of Outlook or Thunderbird that can get big. The goal is to avoid email configuration each

I just want to warn people that want to use the new hashing algorithm for mangled names. And that note should also be put in the man page IMO. You must understand that changing the hashing algorithm on a production server may have unwanted side effects (this is why we maintain by default hash and not hash2 and why it was not back ported to 2.2 initially). Windows clients may save all around

Hi, I tried to configure the new idmap interface. Currently without much success. I have two samba domains, trusting each other. Each PDC using it's own LDAP server. I tried idmap domains = DOM1, DOM2 idmap config DOM1:default = yes idmap config DOM1:backend = ldap idmap config DOM1:ldap_base_dn = ou=Idmap,dc=dom1,dc=mydomain,dc=de idmap config

Hi, I just upgraded from: samba-3.0.23d-1 to: samba-3.0.25b-3 After starting samba, I could no longer connect to any share, I get this error: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND I builded both samba rpm using the packaging/RHEL/makerpms.sh script on Centos 4.5 Is there any big change in 3.0.25? I readed all releases notes and didn't found any cause for this error. Thanks Oliver Here is the