Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "simh".
Did you mean:
simd
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been
> > added with Svr4:
>
> Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?
>
>
2015 Apr 27
0
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...n download ?bsh?, I have no idea why I want bsh based solely on its name. If you tell me that I can download ?od?, I reply that I already have a functioning version of od, thank you very much. :)
2. Many of those who might be interested in your osh are already well served by the Ancient Unix V7 + SIMH combination:
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/ancient/
You are left with the subset of people who want to run something other than the shells that come with their OS, and who want it to run natively.
I should point out that a lot of people using the Ancient Unix images actually don?t wan...
2015 Apr 27
3
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...interactive editable history did look like. Bsh != Bourne Shell.
It was named bsh because I implemented my history editor at H. Berthold AG
while working on a depanded page variant of UNOS.
> 2. Many of those who might be interested in your osh are already well served by the Ancient Unix V7 + SIMH combination:
>
> http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/ancient/
>
> You are left with the subset of people who want to run something other than the shells that come with their OS, and who want it to run natively.
>
> I should point out that a lot of people using the Ancient Uni...