search for: simachijun

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "simachijun".

2018 Mar 22
1
[GSOC 2018] Implement a single updater class for Dominators
...proposed timeline is reasonable and I don't see any major things to > improve there. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions related > to my comments (either here or in the document). > > Thanks, > Kuba > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Chijun Sima <simachijun at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Kuba, >> >> Thanks for your clarification on the project in the previous letter. >> >> I have submitted a proposal draft at the GSoC website, the draft has >> been shared with the LLVM organization. I will appreciate it if y...
2018 Mar 22
0
[GSOC 2018] Implement a single updater class for Dominators
...ell and know what to expect. Your proposed timeline is reasonable and I don't see any major things to improve there. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions related to my comments (either here or in the document). Thanks, Kuba On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Chijun Sima <simachijun at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kuba, > > Thanks for your clarification on the project in the previous letter. > > I have submitted a proposal draft at the GSoC website, the draft has > been shared with the LLVM organization. I will appreciate it if you > can give me some advice...
2018 Mar 21
2
[GSOC 2018] Implement a single updater class for Dominators
...ect > whatever is currently available. I hope this is what you are asking about. > Breaking synchronization between two trees inside the updater class sounds > like something we really want to avoid. > > Sincerely, > Jakub > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chijun Sima <simachijun at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Kuba, >> >> Thanks for your advice in your previous letter. >> >> During last week, I have read the documents on Doxygen and the source >> code of the DomTreeBase/DomTree/PostDomTree/DeferredDominance class, I >> belie...
2018 Mar 14
0
[GSOC 2018] Implement a single updater class for Dominators
...DT and PDT, and the updates should affect whatever is currently available. I hope this is what you are asking about. Breaking synchronization between two trees inside the updater class sounds like something we really want to avoid. Sincerely, Jakub On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chijun Sima <simachijun at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kuba, > > Thanks for your advice in your previous letter. > > During last week, I have read the documents on Doxygen and the source > code of the DomTreeBase/DomTree/PostDomTree/DeferredDominance class, I > believe now I have a much better understa...
2018 Mar 12
2
[GSOC 2018] Implement a single updater class for Dominators
Hi Kuba, Thanks for your advice in your previous letter. During last week, I have read the documents on Doxygen and the source code of the DomTreeBase/DomTree/PostDomTree/DeferredDominance class, I believe now I have a much better understanding on the relationship between these classes and how DeferredDominance class performs lazy updates. I have also learnt the current usage and drawbacks of