search for: silvera

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "silvera".

Did you mean: silver
2014 Jan 27
2
[LLVMdev] Removing ReadOnly from math intrinsics
...ntirely defensible, but needs to be documented clearly. We should also document which rounding mode (and related bits of FP env state) that our optimizations assume. Do we currently model flag writes for floating point? If so, does this effect the discussion? Philip On 1/24/14 5:19 PM, Raul Silvera wrote: > > Right. Like Chandler is saying, these intrinsics are only used under > fno-math-errno and are already properly modeled as not modifying errno. > > The change being proposed only affects the dynamic change of hardware > fp rounding modes, which is not currently support...
2014 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:20:04 PM > Subject...
2014 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:34:39 AM > Subjec...
2014 Jan 25
2
[LLVMdev] Removing ReadOnly from math intrinsics
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>wrote: > On 1/24/14 3:52 PM, Raul Silvera wrote: > > In include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td there is code to mark sqrt and several > other math intrinsics as "ReadOnly", even though they do not read memory. > > According to the comments this was done as an attempt to model changes > to the FP rounding mode. This is...
2014 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] Removing ReadOnly from math intrinsics
...on this? If there are no objections I'll prepare a patch. The alternative would be to develop a mechanism to finely model FP environment changes; even further, it might be possible to come up with a unified model of library call side effects, including errno and even I/O. Thanks, -- Raúl E. Silvera -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140124/8df1de3c/attachment.html>
2014 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 12:15:51 PM > Subjec...
2014 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:09:40 PM > Subjec...
2014 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 7:02:58 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata > > > >
2014 Nov 15
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:31:24 PM > Subject...
2004 May 07
0
Win 98 prob
...e on this network, and I can't seem to pinpoint the issue. The machine seems to 'hang' for several seconds everytime a Context menu is displayed (Start button or right-click on a file or icon). The pop-up context menu simply takes a long time to display." Hope you can help Dave Silvera (PC Webshop Ltd) sales@pcwebshop.co.uk www.pcwebshop.co.uk Tel +44 (0) 1643 709211 Fax +44 (0) 1643 704799 Website Design and Hosting - Internet Solutions - Internet Caf'e
2014 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:26:57 AM > Subjec...
2014 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] Upcoming Changes/Additions to Scoped-NoAlias metadata
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raul Silvera" <rsilvera at google.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:23:25 AM > Subje...
2014 Mar 12
4
[LLVMdev] Autovectorization questions
In order to vectorize code like this LLVM needs to prove that “A[i*7]” does not wrap in the address space. It fails to do so and so LLVM doesn’t vectorize this loop even if we try to force it. The following loop will be vectorized if we force it: int foo(int * A, int * B, int n, int k) { for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i) A[i] += B[i*k]; } So will this loop: int foo(int * restrict A, int
2015 Apr 10
4
[LLVMdev] Optimization on Atomics (and the OpenMP memory model)
Hi everyone, The OpenMP standards committee has begun work to formalize their memory model, and define its relationship to the C/C++ memory models. A questionnaire has been put together (pasted below), and I'd like everyone's help in composing detailed answers to inform their decision-making process. While our OpenMP support is still in active development, many of these questions apply
2014 Jan 17
6
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi all, I propose simple improvement for MergeFunctions pass, that reduced its complexity from O(N^2) to O(log(N)), where N is number of functions in module. The idea, is to replace the result of comparison from "bool" to "-1,0,1". In another words: define order relation on functions set. To be sure, that functions could be comparable that way, we have to prove that order
2014 Jan 21
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, This looks interesting! Some high-level comments: - Please post the patch untarred next time. Also, I'm not sure if it's typical to provide supporting documents in .doc format; while many of us probably have access to Word, a more portable and email-friendly format (like text, markdown or rst) is probably better. - Have you profiled this? What's the speedup? I