Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "silentcreek".
2020 Jul 01
12
[Bug 1439] New: Atomically updating/reloading a large set with nft -f is excessively slow
...Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
Reporter: public_timo.s at silentcreek.de
Hi,
I'm trying to move my iptables/ipset setups to nftables. Some of these setups
involve fairly large sets and updating those atomically does not seem to be
practical due to the excessive amount of time it takes to reload the set via a
script file.
Assume a set that was initialized like...
2020 May 27
17
[Bug 1431] New: flush set doesn't work as expected in script
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1431
Bug ID: 1431
Summary: flush set doesn't work as expected in script
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at
2020 Feb 03
7
[Bug 1404] New: Problems with dynamically managing interval sets with auto-merge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1404
Bug ID: 1404
Summary: Problems with dynamically managing interval sets with
auto-merge
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P5
Component:
2019 Dec 30
24
[Bug 1392] New: nft stalls on EGAIN upon repeatedly flushing and populating a set
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1392
Bug ID: 1392
Summary: nft stalls on EGAIN upon repeatedly flushing and
populating a set
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nft
2020 Jul 01
5
[Bug 1438] New: nft generates wrong intervals for sets with auto-merge
...Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
Reporter: public_timo.s at silentcreek.de
Hi,
I'm relatively new to nftables, currently moving my iptables/ipset setups to
nftables. I did a few experiments with scripting sets and encountered the
following bug in nftables 0.9.0-2 (Debian 10) as well as 0.9.3-2 (Ubuntu
20.04).
If I have the following simple script to set up a set...