Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "significan".
Did you mean:
significant
2009 Feb 05
1
Chi-squared test adjusted for multiple comparisons? Harbe's test?
...m counting number of
animals in the up and down compartment and the calculating the
percentage, I want to know which one of the conditions is different
from each other. If the data wouldn't be percentage I would runt a
kruskal-wallis test to check for general differences and then when
significan a post-hoc test, comparing differents pairs with Man-
Whitney (wilcoxon function in R) with a bonferroni correction for
multiple comparisons. But as the data are in the percentaje form, I
know I need to analize them with either a chi squared or a g-test, but
I have no idea if I can do such a...
2006 Jul 08
1
denominator degrees of freedom and F-values in nlme
Hello,
I am struggling to understand how denominator degrees of freedom and
subsequent significance testing based upon them works in nlme models.
I have a data set of 736 measurements (weight), taken within 3
different age groups, on 497 individuals who fall into two
morphological catagories (horn types).
My model is: Y ~ weight + horn type / age group, random=~1|individual
I am modeling...
2012 Jul 30
0
Problem with Bootres dcc and Dendroclim match
...ng my problems with the DCC function in
the BOOTRES package.
Initially did my analyses in Dendroclim, but when I tried to repeat the
analyses in dcc I encountered some problems, that I think I should report.
First I encountered that that one variable (April precipitation) that was
determined as significant in Dendroclim's response function analysis was not
significant when using the corresponding dcc function, using exactly the
same data and level of significans.
Moreover the values in the output-files of dcc does not reflect completely
the values from Dendroclim (with all decimals).
While D...
2004 Nov 16
5
openssh porting
Hi All,
I want port the openssh on an embedded system based on
powerPC. Is there any document that can guide me to
start?
Thanks in advance,
Mike Zheng
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
2016 Feb 19
1
winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
Hello! This is my first email to the Samba mailing list :)
We have been having an issue on our servers where the winbind service
begins to utilize 100%~ CPU and logs the following error:
*winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found*
We have been running Samba *3.6.3-0.52.5*, however when originally
investigating the problem, it was found that *3.6.3-0.58.1* included a
2011 Apr 01
2
Phrase "package writer" in R-exts
In a conversation with a programmer new to writing R packages, he mentioned that he was very confused by phrase "package writer" used in the document, and said that he "[was] literally imagining some sort of function that writes something related to packages".
I can see his point: not only is it confusing, but I think it's also bad English (one wouldn't say "the
2006 Jan 27
6
Lockups since upgrade 1.2.3 - anyone else? Any ideas?
Boy oh boy. This blows. I upgraded to 1.2.2 from 1.0.9, and of course had
the timebomb bug. Immediately after upgrading to 1.2.3 we were ok, for 24
hours or so.
Since upgrading to 1.2.3, though, the whole system has locked up twice. Once
on Thursday, and then about a half hour ago. The server would reply to a
ping, but no ssh login, no local console login - just locked up. This ain't
good for
2006 Apr 16
0
[S] Problems with lme and 2 levels of nesting:Summary
...el2<-lme(DeathDay~ Treatment,random=~1|Clutch/Cup)
>
> and using lmer (in library lme4):
>
> model3<- lmer(DeathDay ~ Treatment + (1|Clutch:Cup) + (1|Clutch), method="REML")
>
> I get the result that there is NO effect of Treatment. So far so good.
If there is no significant effect for Treatment then I would go on to
fit a model without the Treatment effect and use that model to examine
the significane of the random effects.
> But the above models will not give me any information of the importance of the random factors. If I do the same in SPSS:
>
> glm
>...