search for: signicance

Hi friends, If someone can find out some time to go through my problem would be really grateful. I have a dataset(dataset1) as shown below:-- recmeanC1 recmeanC2 recmeanC3 recmeanC4 i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 1 NA 1 1.00 1.800000 NA 1 NA 1 1 NA 2 2 2 NA 2 2 2 2 1.00

two ARIMA models, both have several bars signicant in ACF and PACF plots of their residuals, but when run Ljung Box tests, both don't show any significant correlations... however, one model has p-value that is larger than the other model, based on the p-values, can I say the model with larger p-values should be better than the model with smaller p-values? [[alternative HTML version

R-help, I'm trying to test the significance of two regression lines , i.e. the significance of the slopes from two samples originated from the same population. Is it correct if I fit a liner model for each sample and then test the slope signicance with 'anova'. Something like this: lm1 <- lm(Y~ a1 + b1*X) # sample 1 lm2 <- lm(Y~ a2 + b2*X) # sample 2 anova(lm1, lm2) Thanks in advance.

This is more of a statistics question with implementation implications. I have used R to calculate logistic regressions for various characterstics. I would now like to verify that the difference between a particular subset is significantly different from the logistic regression of the entire set. Example. I have a logistic regression containing every running back drafted between 1980-2000. I

Hi David: In looking at your original post it is a bit difficult to ascertain exactly what your null hypothesis was. That is, you want to assess whether there is a treatment effect at time 3, but compared to what. I think your second post clears this up. You should refer to pages 224- 225 of Pinhiero and Bates for your answer. This shows how to specify contrasts. > -----Original Message-----

Hi guys, As I mentioned in a previous email I''ve refactored ntp and released a 1.0.0 release candidate. There''s one outstanding "flaw" remaining that''s bothering me and I wanted to solicit opinions on the list. We currently maintain a template per distribution that is close to the stock distribution provided ntp configuration. This leads to massive