search for: signedarithmet

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > For now, I think if I tweak the way I do the build to always build > without pointing to llvm-gcc first, build and test LLVM then build > llvm-gcc and re-build LLVM, it should work. It will take much longer, > though. :( I updated the bug explaining what I'm seeing. I think the correct fix is to use absolute paths to tools

...odeCompletion/ordinary-name.c:1:11 /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CodeCompletion/ordinary-name.c [x86_64-off-opt]: -- [x86_64-off-opt]: Exit Code: 134 but it does not appear to do anything for LLVM tests: [x86_64-off-opt]: FAIL: LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2010-09-15-GEP-SignedArithmetic.ll (2731 of 8411) [x86_64-off-opt]: ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2010-09-15-GEP-SignedArithmetic.ll' FAILED ******************** [x86_64-off-opt]: Script: [x86_64-off-opt]: -- [x86_64-off-opt]: opt < /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicA...

Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> writes: >>> There is definitely something to this.  If I take a random failing >>> testcase and run the test in isolation in the shell, it works.  So >>> what, if anything, does lit/FileCheck/etc. do that might run >>> interference if there is another copy of lit/FileCheck/etc. running >>> at the same time? I

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:09:27 -0600 greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote: > Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes: > > > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3? > > On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent. Also keep in mind that llvm-gcc uses the 4.2 unwinder, so if you are seeing EH failures maybe the EH info generated by

Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes: > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3? On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent. > I only use 4.4 since a while, and it works fairly well. On what platform? > Are you sure it is not a bug in the regression tests themselves > (strict-aliasing bugs, etc.)? No, I'm not sure. > Which

...out." /ptmp/dag/build.llvm.trunk.official.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/hello.c.tmp.out [x86_64-off-dbg]: -- [x86_64-off-dbg]: Exit Code: 1 [x86_64-off-dbg]: [x86_64-off-dbg]: ******************** [x86_64-off-dbg]: FAIL: LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2010-09-15-GEP-SignedArithmetic.ll (2727 of 8402) [x86_64-off-dbg]: ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2010-09-15-GEP-SignedArithmetic.ll' FAILED ******************** [x86_64-off-dbg]: Script: [x86_64-off-dbg]: -- [x86_64-off-dbg]: opt < /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicA...