search for: signdness

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 141 matches for "signdness".

Did you mean: signedness
2020 Nov 18
6
Time sync not working with Windows 10
After our office upgraded to Windows 10, time sync stopped working with the Windows workstations. This used to work fine with Windows 7 and still works with linux domain members (although that's not surprising). The Windows 10 workstations ended up operating off the CMOS clock. We didn't notice this for a long time since the CMOS clock drift is slow, but after several months users started
2020 Nov 23
0
Time sync not working with Windows 10
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:56:07 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On 22/11/2020 02:04, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > From: Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > To: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Time sync not working with Windows 10 > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020
2024 Feb 10
2
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Sat Feb 10 15:31:47 2024 Mark Foley <mfoley at novatec-inc.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 2:20?PM Mark Foley via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Does chrony have to be built in some special way to enable ntp-signd? > > Needs to be configured with "--enable-ntp-signd". I may have to build from sources. I downloaded from the
2024 Feb 11
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Sat Feb 10 17:05:46 2024 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat Feb 10 15:31:47 2024 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 2:20?PM Mark Foley via samb<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Does chrony have to be built in some special way to enable ntp-signd? > > Needs to be configured with
2020 Nov 22
0
Time sync not working with Windows 10
From: Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> Subject: Re: [Samba] Time sync not working with Windows 10 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:13:40 +0000 > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:41:03 -0500 me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > > > > After
2019 Apr 24
2
Odd behavior since upgrading to 4.9.6
----- On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:49 PM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:36:15 -0500 (CDT) > Mike Ray via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> [global] >> dns forwarder = 192.168.2.101 192.168.2.102 > > What are the dns forwarders ? > By this I mean, are they dns servers outside the AD dns domain, no > nothing about
2018 Jun 03
3
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
The output is: alexei at ubuntu-dc:~$ sudo samba -b | grep 'SIGND' NTP_SIGND_SOCKET_DIR: /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:11:47 +0300 > Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba
2018 May 16
1
Samba4 on Ubuntu 18.04 Howto setup ADDC with bind9_DLZ (extra part 4.8.1 samba)
Mandi! Paul Littlefield via samba In chel di` si favelave... > >Does 'timesync' know about signed support ? > >e.g. /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd > No, it doesn't... so I will changing my routine, and RTFM. > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation Absolutely true for DCs, where ntpd with --enable-ntp-signd is needed, to provide NTP service to windows
2019 Apr 24
3
Odd behavior since upgrading to 4.9.6
----- On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:42 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > Hai > > I would suggest first. > > Whats the OS? Linux 18.04 > And sharing your smb.conf might help. [global] dns forwarder = 192.168.2.101 192.168.2.102 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes ldap server require strong auth = no netbios name = dc5 ntp signd socket
2024 Feb 11
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
Congratulations. Happy to hear you got it running. Just out of curiosity and apologies if this has been answered before, but why Slack and not Debian when general consensus is Debian is great for Samba ? Building a Samba AD on Debian is painless and takes 20m from start to finish. Anyway, glad you sort it. LP. On 11 Feb 2024 at 05:11 +0100, Mark Foley <mfoley at novatec-inc.com>, wrote:
2018 Jun 03
4
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:29:04 +0300 > Alexei Rozenvaser via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I'm running samba 4.7.6 on ubuntu 18.04 as (backup / secondary) domain > > controller > > No your not, you are just running Samba as
2019 Apr 24
0
Odd behavior since upgrading to 4.9.6
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:07:37 -0500 (CDT) Mike Ray <mray at xes-inc.com> wrote: > >> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > >> ldap server require strong auth = no > >> netbios name = dc5 > >> ntp signd socket directory = /var/run/samba/ntp_signd > > > > Is the above different from the output of: > > samba -b |
2018 Jun 03
2
chrony configuration for secondary samba DC
Am 03.06.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:37:45 +0300 > Alexei Rozenvaser <alexei.roz at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The output is: >> alexei at ubuntu-dc:~$ sudo samba -b | grep 'SIGND' >> NTP_SIGND_SOCKET_DIR: /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd > > First three letters are NTP and at the moment, Samba only supports the
2012 Dec 12
1
Building NTP RPM Fails on CentOS 6.3
Hello, I am trying to build an NTP v4.2.6p5 RPM using the instructions in the S4 how-to, however rpmbuild fails with the following error: error: File not found by glob: /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ntp-4.2.6p5-2.el6.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/ntpdtime.8* RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/thomas/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ntp-4.2.6p5-2.el6.x86_64/usr/share/man/man8/ntpdtime.8* I
2024 Jan 06
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Sat Jan 6 03:34:43 2024 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 23:53:52 +0000 > Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > You think ntp works with samba but it doesn?t. > > Sorry, but 'ntp' does work, it is the rewrite for more security > 'ntpsec' that doesn't seem to
2018 Oct 13
4
Windows Server 2019 / Windows 10 LTSC can't access samba shares on Debian stable 4.5.12
Hello, my smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = DIRECTORY interfaces = 10.10.10.1 security = user map to guest = Bad User rndc command = /bin/true [iso] comment = ISO browseable = No public = Yes guest only = Yes writable = No directory = /export/ISO I'm using Debian 9.5 with samba version
2024 Jan 06
1
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
On Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:06:48 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat Jan 6 03:34:43 2024 Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 23:53:52 +0000 > > Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > You think ntp works with samba but it doesn?t.
2024 Feb 11
3
Joining Windows 10 Domain Member to Samba AD/DC
Luis, I had mentioned that I first provisioned a Samba4 DC 10 years ago when migrating from Windows Small Business Server. At that time I did try, Zental and Debian before Slackware. Back then Debian did not work well. I had to install lots of additional packages and things like Microsoft Update and Remote Desktop just wouldn't work. I spent months trying various things. I started over with
2013 Jul 08
1
Samba4, NTP, and Ubuntu 12.04
Hello, I have a question regarding signed NTP support for Samba4 on Ubuntu 12.04. I have followed most of the steps outlined here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_NTP These steps I did differently are: * I did not install from source because the latest Ubuntu package for ntp available on Ubuntu 12.04 includes ntp-signd support already * I did not install Samba4 to /usr/local/samba, so
2015 Jul 02
6
boot... round 2
Hi, hpa wrote: > On PowerPC (I think) "unsigned char" is the default. In any case it seems a good idea to interpret the character more explicitely. To my experience, one signdness change causes a little tree of consequential signedness changes or questionable cast operations. How about the following instead ? if ((c >= 0 && c <= ' ') || c == '\x7f') { Besides code improvement there is the riddle of how gcc 5 can spoil the result. > gcc...