Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sign_ext_from_i32".
Did you mean:
sign_ext_from_i16
2008 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
Going that route, and with 64 bit processors picking up, I'm sure soon
we will have to add two more new attributes:
sign_ext_from_i32 and zero_ext_from_i32
which makes the number of attributes 8 (i1,i8,i16,i32) rather than 4
(i8,i16)
Is this exactly what is desired? From one perspective it is good because
it doesn't require too much modification. On the other hand the way that
attributes are designed does not allow much flex...
2008 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
I think the "answer" is yes. Given the attributes are a bitfield, it
would be difficult to encode any arbitrary type. I am happy with just
adding sign_ext_from_i1 and zero_ext_from_i1 for now. That's
progress! :-)
Evan
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, this would be much nicer. The only issue is that