search for: siginificantly

Dear R experts, I am posting this question on behalf of a Japanese R user who wants to know how to change the siginificant codes default. As you know, R's default significant codes are: Signif. codes: 0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1 But he says that it is usual in economics to give codes such as `***' for 0.01, `**' for 0.05 and `*' for

Howdy What I 'd like to analyze with a large data on building permits is to find time series effect of urban policy on buildings as well as cross-sectional effects in any. In 1990 the specialZone urban policy was introduced. I guess that the effects of this specialZone policy would be different from countys. There are counties that do not welcome this specialZone forced to design it. One of

For some reasons the afs tokenforwarding stuff has changed siginificantly from v 2.9p2 to 2.9.9p2. This makes it impossible to use public key authenticication in a standart AFS environment. I don't know the reasons for these changes. In any case attached is a patch which restores the old behaviour. Regards Serge -- Serge Droz Paul Scherrer Institut...

i want to select the significant genes form ?5 clusters (groups) by one way ANOVA ?in r####################################################################################### # i want use One way ANOVA to select the siginificant from the clusters above? selectgene <- function(GropuData,pvalue=0.05, na.rm=TRUE, file=1:5){# if each gruop in one ?txt file ?? ??? ? ??? ? fdata <-

>From: Keir Fraser >Sent: 2005年12月30日 4:34 > >On 29 Dec 2005, at 18:51, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote: > >> So then is p==m in dom0 (and driver domains) an unacceptable design >> alternative for (non-x86) Xen architectures? If it is acceptable, >> then the question remains: > >I think *that* is the critical question here. My feeling is that

We are using VLAN tagging to put several networks on one machine. To ensure quality of service on one of the VLANs, we would like to prioritize (outgoing/egress traffic) one VLAN interface over the other (or others), but without capping bandwidth on any of the interfaces. We want to do this while being careful to minimize increases in latency on the prioritized interface. Since these are two or

...what I have natively with/without vPro". I would usually tend to use a regular Z87 board, because I do not like the "security"-features of the vPro-spec that well. I would ask about AMD too, but I am not up-to-date about their chips and they tend to have worse performance and/or siginificantly higher TDP than Intel chips. If anyone happens to knows a config with AMD that works great however I would appreciate that too. Best regards and many thanks, Michael Dorner

I've run an ancova, edadysexo is a factor with 3 levels,and log(lcc) is the covariate (continous variable) I get this results > ancova<-aov(log(peso)~edadysexo*log(lcc)) > summary(ancova) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) edadysexo 2 31.859 15.9294 803.9843 <2e-16 *** log(lcc) 1 11.389 11.3887 574.8081 <2e-16 ***

> > Note that the current physical=machine in domain0 is not a > > design requirement, just the current implementation. The question > > at hand isn''t whether Xen/ia64 domain0 should be mapped > > physical=machine, > > but -- if it is not -- whether the mapping should be guest-visible. > > The mapping will need to be guest-visible to allow correct

Hi, I have a table in R with data I needed and need to create a contingency table out of it. The table I have so far looks like this: Binger r DietType No Yes Dangerous 15 12 Healthy 52 9 None 134 24 Unhealthy 72 23 These are the error messages that I keep getting whenever I try to get a contingency table. I'm not sure why it won't work

Hi Others can have better insight in your question so i tis preferable to post your mails to the Rhelp list too. I hope your datafile is all numeric. If not after t(datafile) can be character. AFAIK your pvalue is not propagated to aov function. Based on artificial data your construction arrives to result, which in this case tells you that there is almost no difference in those 5 groups.. m

...date. SETUP ===== The script you see above is the script used to copy the data between APACHE and RSERVER. It runs once a night, starting at 21:00 and goes for some hours. The amount of data it has to think about amounts to is some 100 gig. What it has to sync over the course of an evening can be siginificantly less (I see two reports that say 46 meg and 32 meg). The two machines talk to each other over a 100 megabit switched LAN. APACHE is a server that has port forwards to it and has no software firewall running (well Iptables almost always runs, but it has no rules and all chains are set to ACCEPT)....