Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sigill_handl".
Did you mean:
sigill_handler
2014 Jul 27
1
[PATCH] simplify OS SSE support detection
...32be5e8a99364fb38d9e2ea9a3a772>
According to <http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?sigaction>:
"Support for SA_SIGINFO was added in Linux 2.2" (released in Jan 1999).
If noone wants to use FLAC with Linux kernel 2.0 then it's safe to
delete this code.
b) MSVC: try/catch vs. sigill_handler
TRY_CATCH_FLAVOR was enabled in Jan 2009 in commit
<http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=a832ef32fb2a888674659097f40c1f8efb72c1a4>
According to the comment in cpu.c, "sigill_handler flavor resulted in
several crash reports on win32". Also this sigill_handler flavor is not t...
2014 Mar 09
2
PATCH: OS SSE support detection for GCC on Windows
...se any SSE/SSE2/etc routines.
One way to fix it is to call configure script with --enable-sse
(flac will probably crash on Win95/WinNT4 but who cares).
Another way is to add a new code just for GCC+Win32 case.
The patch is attached.
...One thing that worries me is the comment in cpu.c:
/* sigill_handler flavor resulted in several crash reports on win32 */
but the corresponding ticket #307 ( http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/307/ )
doesn't reveal any details.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpu_gcc_win32.patch
Type: application/octet-stream...
2014 Mar 15
2
PATCH: OS SSE support detection, version 2
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> About part 1:does it have any problems? I can split it into several patches
>> (1 fix = 1 patch) or explain the changes in it in detail.
>
> I didn't apply patch1 because I mis-read your comment here:
>
> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004582.html
>
> So, for the patches in this email:
>
>