search for: sigificant

...> can configure three more arbiter bricks > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > have the distribution count also unchanged. I can probably find one or more machines with a few hundred GB free which could be allocated for arbiter bricks if it would be sigificantly simpler and safer than repurposing the existing bricks (and I'm getting the impression that it probably would be). Does it particularly matter whether the arbiters are all on the same node or on three separate nodes? -- Dave Sherohman

...e more arbiter bricks > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > I can probably find one or more machines with a few hundred GB free > which could be allocated for arbiter bricks if it would be sigificantly > simpler and safer than repurposing the existing bricks (and I'm getting > the impression that it probably would be). Yes it is the simpler and safer way of doing that. > Does it particularly matter > whether the arbiters are all on the same node or on three separate > nod...

...; > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > I can probably find one or more machines with a few hundred GB free > > which could be allocated for arbiter bricks if it would be sigificantly > > simpler and safer than repurposing the existing bricks (and I'm getting > > the impression that it probably would be). > > Yes it is the simpler and safer way of doing that. > > > Does it particularly matter > > whether the arbiters are all on the same...

It is easy to spot response nonlinearity in normal linear models using plot(something.lm). However plot(something.glm) produces artifactual peculiarities since the diagnostic residuals are constrained by the fact that y can only take values 0 or 1. What do R users find most useful in checking the linearity assumption of logistic regression (i.e. log-odds =a+bx)? Patrick Foley patfoley at

...e set. Example. I have a logistic regression containing every running back drafted between 1980-2000. I have created an object, logistic.glm. I also have an object, sec.glm, that contains only players from the SEC. I am curious into determining whether or not the difference between the two is sigificant. Subquestion 1: Can I do this for each of the coefficents, beta0 and beta1, individually? i.e there may be a statistically signicant difference in the intercept but not in the rate of decay as a function of my independent variable Subquestion 2: Can the same method of testing differences in re...

I'd like to be able to do a "yum upgrade" without having to hit Y each time. While "yum install -y [program]}" seems to work, "yum -y upgrade" doesn't seem to. Is there a way to easily do this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

.... But in one case I started to wonder. In the first study (1995) zero animals were infested by this parasite. In 2009 most animals were, some of which severely. I have two more factors, thus I was happy finding the package - ordinal. Using a simple Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square test I find a strong sigificant year term. Also lm, assuming normal distribution, finds significant year (and age) term. But in clm I find no significance. Does clm have a problem with one factor level being zero? I have compared the log-likelihood of the link functions and the cauchit gave the highest results. Here is the r code...

...guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you > will > > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > > > I can probably find one or more machines with a few hundred GB free > > > which could be allocated for arbiter bricks if it would be sigificantly > > > simpler and safer than repurposing the existing bricks (and I'm getting > > > the impression that it probably would be). > > > > Yes it is the simpler and safer way of doing that. > > > > > Does it particularly matter > > > whether...

Hello, I'm looking for test users for new iSCSI target software designed for multipath failover cluster nodes. I'm very interested in the virtual machine such as Hyper-V. So I'm also tuning the target for using VMs. I need an environmental report in particular other than FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE p3 i386/PAE kernel w/ZFS. I welcome the report with other initiators below. If you are

Hello all! Consider a dataset with a grouping structure, Group (factor) Several treatments, Treat (factor) Some sort of yield, Yield (numeric) Something, possibly important, measured for each group; GroupCov (numeric) To look for fixed effects from Treat on Yield, a first attempt could be: m1 <- lm(Yield ~ Treat) which gives, in a symmetric situation, the same estimated fixed effects as:

Is anyone using sk98lin Gigabit Ethernet adapters under CentOS 4.x? The version of the driver that ships with CentOS 4.x kernels was too old to support the onboard NICs on some Intel server boards that we recently got, so we installed a newer driver using DKMS. However, we're having problems finding a stable driver to use: the first version that we tried (7.09) gave a kernel panic when I ran

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > > wide quorum: > > Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of > alternating outages. Thanks! > >

HI I want to know Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of investment. Are there some problems with asterisk ??? Varun Gupta India __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >

Hi helpeRs, I've been working through some examples in Pinhiero & Bates( 2000) trying to understand how to translate to the new Lme4 syntax but without much luck. Below is what I think I should do, but either the answers don't come out the same or I get errors. In the Oxide problems I'm particularly interested in obtaining the levels coeficients but this options no longer seems