search for: sigificances

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > aware of the following things: > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. What's the significance of this? I'm trying to find documentation on distribution counts in gluster, but my google-fu is failing me. > - Your data on

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:20:25PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > If you want to use the first two bricks as arbiter, then you need to be > > aware of the following things: > > - Your distribution count will be decreased to 2. > > What's the significance of this? I'm

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if you > > > can configure three more arbiter bricks > > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and you will > > > have the distribution count also unchanged. > > > > I can probably find

It is easy to spot response nonlinearity in normal linear models using plot(something.lm). However plot(something.glm) produces artifactual peculiarities since the diagnostic residuals are constrained by the fact that y can only take values 0 or 1. What do R users find most useful in checking the linearity assumption of logistic regression (i.e. log-odds =a+bx)? Patrick Foley patfoley at

This is more of a statistics question with implementation implications. I have used R to calculate logistic regressions for various characterstics. I would now like to verify that the difference between a particular subset is significantly different from the logistic regression of the entire set. Example. I have a logistic regression containing every running back drafted between 1980-2000. I

I'd like to be able to do a "yum upgrade" without having to hit Y each time. While "yum install -y [program]}" seems to work, "yum -y upgrade" doesn't seem to. Is there a way to easily do this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear R community, I'm trying to analyze a model with an ordinal response variable. I wonder if clm()s (Cumulative Link Models) are appropriate in my case. The study compares parasite infestation of porpoises in 1995 and 2009. The degree of infestation is a rank (mild to severe, as ordered factor). In some parasite species clm gives meaningful results. But in one case I started to wonder. In

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:59:36PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > > Since arbiter bricks need not be of same size as the data bricks, if > you > > > > can configure three more arbiter bricks > > > > based on the guidelines in the doc [1], you can do it live and

Hello, I'm looking for test users for new iSCSI target software designed for multipath failover cluster nodes. I'm very interested in the virtual machine such as Hyper-V. So I'm also tuning the target for using VMs. I need an environmental report in particular other than FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE p3 i386/PAE kernel w/ZFS. I welcome the report with other initiators below. If you are

...ariates. I need one (or two) "doctor second opinion" on this. How is the mathematics inside lme() working? Is some part of the variation I want to catch as an effect from GroupCov already removed by the random call, or why do I get better significances in the pure fixed call? Could these sigificances be some sort of artefact? Cheers /CG PS. I sent basically this question, but in a more special case and with another header, to the list two days ago. Nobody was interested, hopefully this is more tasty ;-) DS. -- CG Pettersson, MSci, PhD Stud. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)...

Is anyone using sk98lin Gigabit Ethernet adapters under CentOS 4.x? The version of the driver that ships with CentOS 4.x kernels was too old to support the onboard NICs on some Intel server boards that we recently got, so we installed a newer driver using DKMS. However, we're having problems finding a stable driver to use: the first version that we tried (7.09) gave a kernel panic when I ran

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > > wide quorum: > > Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of > alternating outages. Thanks! > >

HI I want to know Why large enterprises (F500) are not shifting to asterisk as it is going to save them a lot of investment. Are there some problems with asterisk ??? Varun Gupta India __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >

Hi helpeRs, I've been working through some examples in Pinhiero & Bates( 2000) trying to understand how to translate to the new Lme4 syntax but without much luck. Below is what I think I should do, but either the answers don't come out the same or I get errors. In the Oxide problems I'm particularly interested in obtaining the levels coeficients but this options no longer seems