Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "sigcld_ignor".
Did you mean:
sigcld_ignore
1998 Jan 27
0
HPUX compilations and Samba 1.9.18p2
...found that following change had been done:
--------------------------------------------------------------
1.32.2.3 Tue Oct 7 11:18:26 :Australia/NSW 1997 by tridge
CVS Tags: release-1-9-17p5, release-1-9-17p4, release-1-9-17p3; Branch:
BRANCH_1_9_17
Diffs to 1.32.2.2 ; Diffs to 1.36
get rid of SIGCLD_IGNORE for HPUX. A user reported it causing lots
of defunct smbd processes.
Andrew
1.36 Tue Oct 7 11:14:27 :Australia/NSW 1997 by tridge
Diffs to 1.35
get rid of SIGCLD_IGNORE for HPUX. A user reported it causing lots
of defunct smbd processes.
Andrew
---------------------------------------------...
1998 Mar 31
0
Semaphore problem on HP-UX ?
...===========
RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/includes.h,v
retrieving revision 1.56.2.10
diff -w -b -c -r1.56.2.10 includes.h
*** includes.h 1998/03/27 20:45:41 1.56.2.10
--- includes.h 1998/03/31 18:28:10
***************
*** 612,617 ****
--- 612,622 ----
not good for HPUX */
/* #define SIGCLD_IGNORE */
#define USE_SIGPROCMASK /* Needed to stop zombie processes on HPUX 9.x and 10.x.*/
+ #ifdef HPUX10
+ #ifdef SEMMSL
+ #undef SEMMSL
+ #endif /* SEMMSL */
+ #endif /* HPUX10 */
#endif /* HPUX */
------------end patch--------------------------
1999 Jan 21
4
HPUX 9.05 & Samba 2.0.0 & problems !
...code 'open.c' and the function comments on
check_access_allowed_for_current_user() and it says that there is something
ugly in it with POSIX locking braindamage!
About one year ago (Samba Digest, Jan 1998: HPUX compilations and Samba
1.9.18p2)
I had problems with HPUX when the flag #define SIGCLD_IGNORE was removed
from HPUX. Lots of <defunct> processes appeared. Maybe this one relates to
this and the signal handling in general in HPUX 9.0x compared to other Unixes?
Does anyone have this kind of problems in HPUX 10.20? I know that we have
to upgrade to at least this version some day along...