search for: sigareyouwell

Damien Miller wrote: > I agree: what is happening here seems to be mostly bad assumptions and > inflexibility inside systemd. I didn't say that, and I don't agree with that, to me it's welcome ambition rather than bad assumptions. Consider this: How could systemd determine whether startup of a foreground daemon completed successfully or failed? Other than explicit

I'm not sure I agree with Peter in respect to his comment about "building a dependency to systemd". The only time a "dependency" would be created is when the end-user would configure it to be there with a configure time flag of --with-systemd. Just having the code available and dormant without that flag being provided builds in no dependency whatsoever and gives the