search for: sigalrm

Hi, We have a few users experiencing locking problem. When starting Thunderbird, there is no new emails in Inbox. Dovecot createa a lock file /var/spool/mail/<user>.lock. It never completes openning Inbox. If closing the mail client, the open imap session does not get closed, nor the lock file get deleted. Here are the errors in log: dovecot: Oct 13 11:18:35 Warning: IMAP(user1): Our

Gidday everbody, We have just found an interesting issue regarding the sshd daemon on our SuSE system. For some reasons, the /usr/sbin/sshd process blocks SIGALRM as shown in the /proc/pid/status: $ cat /proc/`cat /var/run/sshd.init.pid`/status Name: sshd State: S (sleeping) SleepAVG: 0% [...] SigPnd: 0000000000000000 ShdPnd: 0000000000000000 SigBlk: 0000000000002000 <-- SIGALRM is blocked SigIgn: 0000000000001000 As a result, any descendent p...

Hi I'm compiling: /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: -------------------------- @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib --tag=disable-shared --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -c -I/usr/local/build/llvm/lib/Support -I/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support -I/usr/local/build/llvm/include -I/usr/local/src/llvm/include -I../../include -I/usr/local/s...

Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > I'm compiling: /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp > on MinGW. However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it send (according to the MinGW docs)? -- John T. > -------------------------- > @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib --tag=disable-shared --silent --tag=CXX > --mode=compile g++ -c -I/usr/local/build/llvm/lib/...

Hi, I am seeing a problem where in sshd gets terminated by SIGALRM. sshd was listening on the socket and was not restarted. I saw a recent bug fix in openBSD openssh CVS which mentions: Clear alarm() before restarting sshd on SIGHUP. Without this, if there's a SIGALRM pending (for SSH1 key regeneration) when sshd is SIGHUP'ed, the newly exec'ed s...

...ep, and when the thread wakes up, "ring the alarm". Reid. John Criswell wrote: > Henrik Bach wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm compiling: >> /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. >> However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: > > > Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it > send (according to the MinGW docs)? > > -- John T. > >> -------------------------- >> @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib --tag=disable-shared --silent --tag=CXX >> --...

...". > > Reid. > > John Criswell wrote: > > Henrik Bach wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> I'm compiling: > >> /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. > >> However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: > > > > > > Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it > > send (according to the MinGW docs)? > > > > -- John T. > > > >> -------------------------- > >> @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib --tag=d...

Hello All, It seems that 'getent group groupname' hangs on large groups for Solaris 8/9 running winbind. Currently running Samba 3.0.20 but also tried 3.0.10. 'ls -l' also hangs if listing a file created by a user who's primary group is too large(such as Domain Users). Users can still access the files but netbackups hang. The problem I am experiencing is found in the

...lags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID| SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0xf7e666f8) = 3343 close(6) = 0 close(5) = 0 alarm(5) = 0 wait4(-1, 0xffbd7e9c, 0, NULL) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted) --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGALRM +++ Process 3342 detached Finally, my system is: root at taleira:~# dovecot --version 1.1.4 root at taleira:~# uname -a Linux taleira 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Nov 8 21:20:04 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Any ideas? /Magnus

...;>>>Henrik Bach wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi >>>>> >>>>>I'm compiling: >>>>>/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. >>>>>However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: >>>> >>>> >>>>Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it >>>>send (according to the MinGW docs)? >>>> >>>>-- John T. >>>> >>>> >>>>>-------------...

sshd will die from an unhandled SIGALRM if you allow SSH1 connections, ssh in, HUP sshd, and don't ssh in again for KeyRegenerationInterval. The HUP handler calls exec which resets signal handlers but persists alarm timers. Chapter and verse: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/alarm.html -- Andrew Gaul ht...

sshd will die from an unhandled SIGALRM if you allow SSH1 connections, ssh in, HUP sshd, and don't ssh in again for KeyRegenerationInterval. The HUP handler calls exec which resets signal handlers but persists alarm timers. Chapter and verse:...

...===================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/displayq.c,v retrieving revision 1.4.2.5 retrieving revision 1.4.2.6 diff -u -u -r1.4.2.5 -r1.4.2.6 --- displayq.c 1997/10/15 12:25:35 1.4.2.5 +++ displayq.c 1997/11/07 13:20:29 1.4.2.6 @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ savealrm = signal(SIGALRM, alarmhandler); alarm(CT); fd = getport(RM, 0); + alarm(0); (void)signal(SIGALRM, savealrm); if (fd < 0) { if (from != host) Index: src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd/printjob.c,...

...ba user, or whatever. On the Solaris box, I can find a core file in the swat directory. If I truss (see the system calls) the inetd process and its childs, I see at the end: ...[27542 is the swat PID]... 27542: open64("/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd", O_RDONLY) = 5 27542: sigaction(SIGALRM, 0xEFFFEF98, 0x00000000) = 0 27542: alarm(5) = 300 27542: fcntl(5, F_SETLKW64, 0xEFFFF0A8) = 0 27542: alarm(0) = 5 27542: sigaction(SIGALRM, 0xEFFFEF98, 0x00000000) = 0 27542: fchmod(5, 0600)...

http://www.core-sdi.com/advisories/ssh1_sessionkey_recovery.htm includes the line of code: kill(SIGALRM, getppid()); This is contained within what is listed as an "unsupported and untested patch" developed by SSH.com. The problem is that the arguments to "kill" are in the wrong order. In other words, to obtain the effect that was apparently intended, the line of code should have...

...ba-4.2.0rc4/bin' Selected embedded Heimdal build [ 680/3738] Compiling lib/texpect/texpect.c ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:79:8: error: unknown type name 'sig_atomic_t' static sig_atomic_t alarmset = 0; ^ ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:265:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SIGALRM' if (alarmset == SIGALRM) { ^ ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:391:15: warning: assigning to 'char *const *' from 'const char **' discards qualifiers in nested pointer types [-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards...

...cted embedded Heimdal build > [ 680/3738] Compiling lib/texpect/texpect.c > ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:79:8: error: unknown type name 'sig_atomic_t' > static sig_atomic_t alarmset = 0; > ^ > ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:265:20: error: use of undeclared identifier > 'SIGALRM' > if (alarmset == SIGALRM) { > ^ > ../lib/texpect/texpect.c:391:15: warning: assigning to 'char *const *' > from 'const char **' discards > qualifiers in nested pointer types > [-Wincom...

I'm still seeing some of these in the CVS version as of Oct. 6: dovecot: Oct 07 11:09:42 Error: child 2410 (imap) killed with signal 14 It's happening quite a bit less since this fix: 2005-09-30 18:25 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> * src/lib-index/mail-index-lock.c: Don't leak alarm() with in-memory indexes Todd

...understanding the problem and determining if there any unexpected side effects of the change. First, the code change: $ diff orig_session.c session.c 216c216,218 < alarm(0); --- > verbose("Clearing alarm in do_authenticated"); > /*alarm(0);*/ > signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); So, I replaced "alarm(0);" in do_authenticated with a call to verbose and a "signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);" Now, the problem description. We are running OpenSSH 4.2p1 on Solaris 8 (Sparc) that has a recent recommended patch cluster installed. When we connect to this s...

...ctive for telnet in my pam.conf I got a kick out of the system after exactly 300 sec, no mather if I do or do not activity on the telnet session. The same behavior is for AD and for local users. I've trussed a telnet session a the only thing I see is that my process is killed with a signal 14 (SIGALRM). Do anybody have an idea from where the kick out of the system is coming? Any other Samba Parts are running fine: net ads testjoin -> OK net ads info -> OK net ads status -Uxxx -> OK net ads user -Uxxx -> OK getent passwd, group -> OK all shares can be accessed as wanted by the A...