search for: sieze

...r: CN=NTDS Settings\0ADEL:aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee,CN=DC1\0ADEL:ffffffff-1111-2222-3333-444444444444,CN=Servers,CN=MySite,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=mydomain,DC=org which makes sense, as the old DC1 has been removed. However - this is where I am having problems. I can't seem to sieze the roles onto DC2 (which has been running for years and should still be fine...) Am I getting the syntax wrong? I have been following the guide on the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Seizing_a_FSMO_Role however when I run the following command, this is...

...ist <- aggregate(data = Sample, Value ~ Name, list) Hope this will help someone else! Sartene Bel > Message du 21/10/13 ? 16h29 > De : sartene at voila.fr > A : r-help at r-project.org > Copie ? : > Objet : Aggregate values in one dataframe into a list of vectors of different sieze > > Hi everyone, > > I have a data frame that is quite huge (dozens of millions of lines). > > It looks like this : > > Name????? Value > Name1??? 156 > Name2??? 458963 > Name3??? 758 > ... > Name143 89325 > Name1???? 4678 > Name42?? 766 > Name144...

Hi everyone, I have a data frame that is quite huge (dozens of millions of lines). It looks like this : Name      Value Name1    156 Name2    458963 Name3    758 ... Name143 89325 Name1     4678 Name42   766 Name144 777 ... Name2     46767 ... Each name and and value has no predefined length and may be repeated any number of times. My goal is to have a list (aggregating the numbers relative

After accidentally destroying my primary DC which held all of the FSMO roles, I am unable to show any roles, or sieze the naming role. I initialy tried to sieze --role=all, and it failed, but by doing them individually I was able to seize them all except for the naming role. Any suggestions on how to fix this? # samba-tool fsmo show -d 9 <removed generic debug info> pm_process() returned Yes ldb_wrap...

...ages/samba/netcmd/fsmo.py", line 42, in get_fsmo_roleowner master_owner = res[0]["fSMORoleOwner"][0] sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dbcheck --fix --cross-ncs Checking 3527 objects ERROR: fSMORoleOwner not found for role CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com Sieze role CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com onto current DC by adding fSMORoleOwner=CN=NTDS Settings,CN=CBADC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com [y/N/all/none] y Failed to sieze role CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbell...

...2, in get_fsmo_roleowner > master_owner = res[0]["fSMORoleOwner"][0] > > > sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dbcheck --fix --cross-ncs > Checking 3527 objects > ERROR: fSMORoleOwner not found for role CN=RID > Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com > Sieze role CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com onto > current DC by adding fSMORoleOwner=CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=CBADC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com > [y/N/all/none] y > Failed to sieze role CN=RID > Manager$...

I'm having a problem getting outbound trunking to work using asterisk and an external SIP FXO. 7 digit dialing produces the following output: -- Executing Dial("SIP/mitel-fe17", "SIP/5925660@mediatrix-1204") in new stack -- Called 5925660@mediatrix-1204 -- SIP/mediatrix-1204-645e answered SIP/mitel-fe17 -- Attempting native bridge of SIP/mitel-fe17 and

On 05/28/2015 04:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: >> On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I ran into that

...42, in get_fsmo_roleowner > master_owner = res[0]["fSMORoleOwner"][0] > > > sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dbcheck --fix --cross-ncs > Checking 3527 objects > ERROR: fSMORoleOwner not found for role CN=RID > Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com > Sieze role CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com onto > current DC by adding fSMORoleOwner=CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=CBADC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=cb,DC=cliffbells,DC=com > [y/N/all/none] y > Failed to sieze role CN=RID Manager$,CN=Syste...

...at's the status of SIP-T in Asterisk? I haven't been able to find a whole lot of info on SIP-T but seems like just an extension of SIP. Right? Now if I had a PSTN Gateway (that is a SS7 gateway) that supported SIP-T, could I signal * with SIP-T from it and have asterisk utilize MGCP to sieze a particular DS0 on a remote DS1? Hmm.. What am I missing here.. ?? Hmm, but outbound calls would be more complicated I think.. Let see, SIP user dials a number, we'll eventually place a dial out on the MGCP line, but we need to first send a few SIP-T messages to find out where to put it....

Hello, after demote and rejoun my dc2 i have problems with replication. First of all some srv records on dc1 are missing, on dc2 they are exist. root at dc2:~# dig srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Debian <<>> srv _ldap._tcp.ForestDnsZones.samdom.example.com @dc2.samdom.example.com. ;; global

On 06/11/2015 04:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/06/15 00:20, John Lewis wrote: >> On 05/28/2015 04:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>> On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>>>>>

...ces to CBADC02 & CBADC03. Replication between FILER and CBADC01 is successful. RSync replication of sysvol from FILER to CBADC01 is running via cron. I am spun. I've been banging my head against Samba since 12/17/2015. Please advise, I need to get these VMs joined to the domain so I can sieze FSMO roles off of FILER so I don't have to keep restoring this ^&*(@^#()*&^ database every 36 hours. JS On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:15 AM, IT Admin <it at cliffbells.com> wrote: > Good times... > > Spent hours today rolling a fresh VM. > > FAIL > > i...

On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >> >> >> I ran into that while trying to rebuild my LXC's as Debian 8. The >> proposed work arrounds assume you have access to a Windows Domain >> controller in

>> Yes, you can run the internal dns server on one DC and Bind9 on >> another, I also know that you should upgrade jessie as soon as >> possible, it is now EOL. >> Rowland which lead me to my second question: I have a AD primary DC who is under debian Jessie as previously said. When i have try to update it to stretch all sort of weird bug have appears on the ad

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I lost my DC with all fsmo-roles. I try to "seize" the roles to another DC. It worked four out of five roles: root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid Attempting transfer... Transfer unsuccessful, seizing... FSMO seize of 'rid' role successful root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=pdc Attempting

...sume. Your on debian Buster official samba correct? ( samba 4.9.5 ) and your using internal DNS. Configs looks ok in the debug output. No app armor Denied messages. Dns is running and basilcy your resolving looks ok. And while im looking at this. You joined this server to a windows AD-Domain and siezed fsmo roles, correct? Can you try this, if this helps, in then end you can switch the 2 dns servers ip's. Change you /etc/resolv.conf to # First a windows AD-DC DNS. nameserver 10.10.1.XXXS # Second This server IP. nameserver 10.10.1.10 search edm-inc.com Your krb5.conf, i suggest you ch...

On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: > On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >>> >>> >>> I ran into that while trying to rebuild my LXC's as Debian 8. The >>> proposed work arrounds

...ronise, declare the second one as dead and > make the second the primary one. Am i wrong somewhere ? Nope and this is also the best option. I could assist in a Jessie to stretch to buster upgrade. Only thing is, i know whats coming and i recommend setup a new server setup straight on buster. Sieze the FSMO, and remove the old server. > > Any advice ? See up ;-) > > best regards. Greetz, Louis