Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "sievetest".
Did you mean:
sieve_test
2020 Sep 03
2
Sieve: deleteheader not working with duplicate filter for implicit keep
...st.msg
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: Pigeonhole version 0.5.11 (d71e0372) initializing
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: include: sieve_global is not set; it is currently not possible to include `:global' scripts.
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: Using Sieve script path: /home/alec/sievetest/header/mini.sieve
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: script: Opened script `mini' from `/home/alec/sievetest/header/mini.sieve'
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: script: Opened script for reading
sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: Script `mini' from /home/alec/sievet...
2020 Sep 04
0
Sieve: deleteheader not working with duplicate filter for implicit keep
...ve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: Pigeonhole version 0.5.11 (d71e0372) initializing
> sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: include: sieve_global is not set; it is currently not possible to include `:global' scripts.
> sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: Using Sieve script path: /home/alec/sievetest/header/mini.sieve
> sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: script: Opened script `mini' from `/home/alec/sievetest/header/mini.sieve'
> sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: file storage: script: Opened script for reading
> sieve-test(alec): Debug: sieve: Script `mini' from /h...
2009 Feb 23
1
sieve-test again
...ecot maildir - so
is in the normal format of having headers, a new line, then the body.
There is nothing exceptional about this email.
Notice how the header below is 'innocent', however it appears that the
test is ignoring this header.
# grep DSPAM-Res test
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
# cat sievetest
require ["regex",
"fileinto","envelope","reject","vacation","relational","comparator-i;ascii-numeric"];
if header :contains "X-DSPAM-Result" "Innocent"
{
fileinto "moo";
stop;
}
# sieve-test -c...
2020 Aug 29
2
Sieve: deleteheader now working with duplicate filter for implicit keep
Hello,
I have a rule to always delete a header. If the message gets fileinto'd,
the header is gone, but if it's delivered into the INBOX through
implicit keep, the header does not get deleted.
Interestingly, if I remove the "if duplicate" filter, the header does
get deleted as expected.
I'm using the latest Dovecot 2.3.11.3 / Pigeonhole 0.5.11.
Any idea why this is
2020 Sep 26
2
managesieve script 'redirect' fails @ "Error: sieve: ... aborted due to temporary failure; Error: smtp-server: ... failed: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number"; direct send OK ?
...unt=0 body_bytes=0
2020-09-26 16:00:33 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user2 at example2.net>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.0.1.9, lip=10.0.1.17, mpid=7185, TLS
I've added a user sieve script for user == user2 at example2.net
cat /srv/mail/sieve-scripts/user2 at example2.net.sieve
# rule:[SIEVETEST]
if header :contains "subject" "SIEVETEST"
{
redirect "admin at mx.example.com";
}
where the redirect is to the valid address tested/demonstrated above, admin at mx.example.com
in dovecot config,
submission_host = internal.mx.example.com:60465
currently,...
2020 Sep 27
1
managesieve script 'redirect' fails @ "Error: sieve: ... aborted due to temporary failure; Error: smtp-server: ... failed: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number"; direct send OK ?
adding a second, non-redirect action to the sieve rule in order to test,
+ require ["copy","fileinto"];
# rule:[SIEVETEST]
if header :contains "subject" "SIEVETEST"
{
+ fileinto :copy "testing";
redirect "user2 at example2.com";
}
on send exec, the 'fileinto' action does work as expected.
the 'redirect' fails as above.
so the problem appears not to be...
2009 Jul 20
3
Bug in Dovecot Managesieve or Horde ?
...quot;imapflags". Two
small patches in Horde code resolves that, but I do not know if that's
the right way.
cd webmail2/ingo/lib
vi ./Script/sieve.php:
function requires()
{
//return array('imapflags');
return array('imap4flags');
}
vi ./tests/SieveTest.php:
function testBlacklistMarker()
{
$bl = &new Ingo_Storage_blacklist(3);
$bl->setBlacklist(array('spammer at example.com'));
$bl->setBlacklistFolder(INGO_BLACKLIST_MARKER);
$this->store($bl);
//$this->assertScript('req...
2009 Dec 28
6
Dovecot-deliver sometimes fails when message set to discard via sieve
Hi, sometimes mails that i discard via sieve gets delivered to my inbox
and i can not figure out why. So i hope you can give me a hint.
My setup is:
I use a self compiled dovecot 1.2.4 with installed sieve and managesieve
plugin.
Incoming mails a processed by Postfix and the delivered to Procmail.
Procmail invokes Spamassassin and discard all mails marked as spam. The
other mails are passed to
2013 Jun 14
5
Allowing clients to test their Sieve scripts
Hi,
One thing which came up repeatedly is that clients using the IMAP server I run (using Dovecot 2.1) wonder whether they broke their Sieve scripts, i.e. it often goes like "I don't know whether I just didn't receive any mail, or whether my filters broke. Can you check the logs?".
I then usually just run the sieve-test binary (part of the Pigeonhole distribution) and send them
2017 Jul 10
0
fit lognorm to cdf data
* fitdistr?
* it seems unusual (to me) to fit directly to the data with lognormal... fitting a normal to the log of the data seems more in keeping with the assumptions associated with that distribution.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On July 10, 2017 7:27:47 AM PDT, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote:
>Dear all
>
>I am struggling to fit data which form
2017 Jul 10
4
fit lognorm to cdf data
Dear all
I am struggling to fit data which form something like CDF by lognorm.
Here are my data:
proc <- c(0.9, 0.84, 0.5, 0.16, 0.1)
size <- c(0.144, 0.172, 0.272, 0.481, 0.583)
plot(size, proc, xlim=c(0,1), ylim=c(0,1))
fit<-nls(proc~SSfpl(size, 1, 0, xmid, scal), start=list(xmid=0.2, scal=.1))
lines(seq(0,1,.01), predict(fit, newdata=data.frame(sito=seq(0,1,.01))), col=2)
I tried