search for: sidetracks

Hello- I've been trying to scour both * and linux user group archives for a solution to this particular problem, but I am just plan stuck. I got the latest zaptel sources from cvs, uncommented ztdummy.o in Makefile, ran make; make install then, did depmod -a. All is well up until now. When i do modprobe ztdummy, i get this error: dv@sidetrack:/usr/local/src/zaptel# depmod -a

Dear all, sorry if this is a bit on the sidetrack for R-help. As a regular R user I have developed quite a lot of custom R functions, to the point of not always remembering what I have already programmed, where the file is and so on. I was wondering what other people do in this regards. A basic file with all your functions, or a custom R package, or directly integrated into a profile file

I have been looking at replacing our current login systems with a single login solution. In the process I managed to get sidetracked into investigating pam_pkcs11. My question, which no doubt reveals the depth of my ignorance, is: Can a simple USB flash memory stick be configured to work with this or some similar module of which I as yet know nothing? Everything I have managed to find about

Hello, I am trying to find a WebDAV library for Ruby that works with fastcgi (production) and Webbrick (development). I''ve found this link which mentions a Webbrick WebDAV library: http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/ webrickWebdavHandlerSafelyExtractedFromTheWild.html Unfortunately it sounds limited to Webbrick which will not suit the production environment. Does anyone know of a

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Nicolas Capens <nicolas.capens at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > It's not broken, but the performance is crippled. > > I noticed that the code still contains some MMX instructions, but several > operations get expanded (apparently swizzling and such get expanded to a > large number of byte moves). I think some changes related to

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Nathan Jeffords <blunted2night at gmail.com> wrote: > This is cool, I was looking into something like this, but hit a little bit > of a wall, and then got sidetracked on another project. I was going to use > llc to generate COFF object files as opposed to clang. Seems to me llc would > give better control over what was generated and would also not

On Thu, September 21, 2017 12:42 pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Than was my first reaction when I realized that logged in with GUI (X11) >> user can turn off (and on) network interfaces. Without being in sudoers >> file. > > Would not being in sudoers prevent them from pulling the cord out? The > rational for the control is well justified for users with multiple >

I wasn't sure how to respond to John Byrd's post, since it wasn't addressed to me. So I've responded to Nicolai's. I'm reasonably far along in the process of writing a new Programmer's Guide for TableGen. I will continue working on it and submit it for review. I expect to do some rewriting as a result. John: Would you like me to respect a copyright on your documents

I was wondering today whether the TableGen DAG support would be more useful if you could manipulate DAGs a little more easily. Right now, you can: * Specify a DAG with (...) * Catenate DAGs with !con(). * Construct a DAG with !dag(). * Iterate over a DAG with !foreach(). * Get and set the DAG operator with !getop() and !setop(). What if you could also get and set a DAG's operands

The issue is that some of the smb.conf parameters have quotes in funny places that need to stay there (particularly the smbldap script "wrappers"). The smbldap tools will issue funny warnings that help to sidetrack finding actual problems... Patch attached. --- smbldap-tools-0.8.8/smbldap_tools.pm.org Mon Apr 4 02:03:34 2005 +++ smbldap-tools-0.8.8/smbldap_tools.pm Thu Apr 7

This is cool, I was looking into something like this, but hit a little bit of a wall, and then got sidetracked on another project. I was going to use llc to generate COFF object files as opposed to clang. Seems to me llc would give better control over what was generated and would also not require clang to be in the tree. Is there any documentation on how to run these tests from windows? - Nathan

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated dependencies. What do you think of this? Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of FHDATA Sent: den 18 september 2017 18:10 To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though. > > I for one use keepassx. My password database

I got sidetracked while benchmarking ruby factorial code: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Factorial#Ruby I put all that code into test_fact.rb and ran with: > ruby test_fact.rb > rails runner test_fact.rb #from a fresh rails app > rails runner test_fact.rb #from a mature rails app here are the respective results: user system total real #ruby recursive:

On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:23 AMPDT, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the late reply. I got sidetracked by other fun projects. ;-) > > I found that the performance regression is caused by revisions 112804, > 112805 and 112806. Those changes were made 2 days prior to the 2.8 > branching, so it may have not been the intention to include them there? > Either way

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lamar Owen > Sent: den 7 april 2016 16:21 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > It does take more disk space to do this. > > And while I have always been a big fan of RPM and

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:23:57AM +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > On 14/07/2019 22:03, ?brah?m Gyula via samba wrote: > > I have a Raspberry Pi 3 B+ with Raspbian Buster and a Samba AD DC is running on it. Everything works fine, I use Active Directory Users And Computers and Computer Management on Windows to control the users and the Samba share permissions. Until this point everything

You can attach debug info to the Llvm module about LLVM IR, at which point one can throw the executable into any debugger and get llvm level debugging. I've started a patch to revive this feature (DebugIR pass). I've been sidetracked the past month, but I'll come back to it soon :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D40778 Cheers, Siddharth On Thu 4 Jan, 2018, 09:23 Brenda So via llvm-dev,

On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the late reply. I got sidetracked by other fun projects. ;-) > > I found that the performance regression is caused by revisions 112804, > 112805 and 112806. Those changes were made 2 days prior to the 2.8 > branching, so it may have not been the intention to include them there? > Either way they

>This issue has actually cropped up again recently in my testing. When I >do use Solaris login (UseLogin yes), a ton of the important environment >variables (like TERM, etc) don't get passed. Is that normal behavior? Looking at the source os session.c it is obvious that when you use login the environment is not passed: execl(LOGIN_PROGRAM, "login",