search for: sidelin

...nd to break out small incremental changes to they're easier to review, but this works only up to a certain point. What happens is that I find I need some "enabler" change. Adding a data structure to carry enough context to the place where my new code needs it. The other thing is "sideline work": while reviewing code for my change, I find something unrelated that should really be fixed right away. Low-hanging fruit and such. I commit enablers and sideline changes, but I find I can't do so if there is already main-task work done in that file. With git, I can single out indi...

Hello, Has a decision been made yet as to whether R 4.0.0 on Windows is going to be built using the new gcc8 toolchain (described at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/testing/rtools40.html)? >From the sidelines, I can see that the toolchain is being used to build and test packages on CRAN; if there are any remaining issues that I can help to try and run down (either in R or any CRAN packages) I'd be happy to try and help. FWIW, I'm excited at the prospect at seeing a new toolchain for Windows,...

...ence.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. > > I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the > culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. > > The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and > SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in > support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK se...

...Sharing only happens when two instructions have the "same" memory > reference info. You just need to make sure that the non-temporal > flag is significant. It's not fundamentally different from the > volatile flag in this respect. Metadata is used to monitor values from the sideline. It should not influence optimization or code gen in general other then the intended recipient of the metadata info. So your suggestion is not a good idea for all kind of metadata in general. Just a note. - Devang

...al I promise. Hey, I'm working on optimization, and I know "it works". Curious, have you ever heard of "false sharing" and "true sharing" and what lies behind them? Hint: it has todo with the cacheline and its size, and memory alignment etc... No need to start a sideline discussion here. Ciao

...016 8:03 AM, "James Molloy" <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > > Rafael, > > I appreciate that your goals are to create a performant linker, quickly. I understand that and wouldn't want to slow you down unnecessarily, especially as I appreciate that I'm on the sidelines and not producing patches for LLD at the moment. > > I also appreciate that LLD/ELF development has certainly picked up pace recently and we might actually have a functioning linker sometime soon. That is very exciting, and thankyou for all your work. > > My worry is that the technica...

In the Hexagon backend we originally treated CFI instructions as "solo", > i.e. they could not be packetized with any other instruction. Now we > simply delay the generation of these instructions until after > packetization. The reason for this is that two instructions that could be > packetized together were not packetized together if there was an CFI > instruction in

...sk 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to >>>> make >>>> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >>>> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. >>> >>> I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being >>> the >>> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >>> >>> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI >>> and >>> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in...

On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:07 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Thursday 11 February 2010 14:02:13 Dan Gohman wrote: > >>>> Putting a bit (or multiple bits) in MachineMemOperand for this >>>> would also make sense. >>> >>> Is there any chance a MachineMemOperand will be shared by multiple >>> instructions? >> >> Yes. > > Then

...someone came along and showed us we could do all we ever wanted with some whizz bang new language and it would require minimal effort on our part, i'm sure we'd use it. Nobody has done this. You certainly will never achieve the goal of getting people to use new languages by sitting on the sidelines and saying how sad it is. --Dan

...uot; The first prompt is a keyboard-interactive prompt; the second prompt is the password prompt. please try again with -oKbdInteractiveAuthentication=no Regards, --dkg PS if possible, you should probably avoid using password authentication for the root account anyway, but that's a sideline to the issue you're seeing here. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from trey.henefield at ultra-ats.com sent at 2015-01-15 17:54:25 is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for use by openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org and others authorized to...

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Jason Kim wrote: > Great point. A potential conversion to git should be motivated by its > benefits - assuming no development policy change - and that benefit > needs to be greater than the various costs of conversion. Here are the most important benefits I see for the LLVM projects: - git greatly

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Jason Kim wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 9:54 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> wrote: > Lot of good points. > > > Yep, switching to git would require a lot of work on the project > > maintainers' side. Commit hooks, setting up repositories, rewording > > policies in terms of the commands of the new tools, and that

Rob - Just stepping in from the sidelines . . . with a few tidbits. Nut uses pkgconfig to find and identify stuff as part of it's build . . . So, depending on where your libusb install went, if it wasn't in the default "PKG_CONFIG_PATH" setting, it won't be found. Much like other shell variables, you can adjust...

In August last year I posted this bug, a brief summary of which would be that ZFS still accepts writes to a faulted pool, causing data loss, and potentially silent data loss: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6735932 There have been no updates to the bug since September, and nobody seems to be assigned to it. Can somebody let me know what''s happening with this

...when two instructions have the "same" memory >> reference info. You just need to make sure that the non-temporal >> flag is significant. It's not fundamentally different from the >> volatile flag in this respect. > > Metadata is used to monitor values from the sideline. It should not > influence optimization or code gen in general other then the intended > recipient of the metadata info. So your suggestion is not a good idea > for all kind of metadata in general. Just a note. I was talking about MachineMemOperands in the above, not metadata. But that...

...o have a directive to restrict a menu entry to certain architectures, e.g., LABEL someentry MENU LABEL Some EFI-only entry MENU ARCH efi32 efi64 KERNEL path/to/efi-only/kernel and a menu will be skipped (not displayed) if it doesn't match the architecture. Easy to stand on the sidelines and suggest new features... a round of gratitude to the developers who think about the suggestions and have the time and skill to implement them! Thanks, Alex

...internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it will...

...that >>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >>> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service >>> script for systemd.? And that doesn't make any difference. >> >> I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the >> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >> >> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and >> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >> support/suexec.c, if compiled wit...