search for: siddu

You can also `-disable-verify -o <output-filename> ` which will disable the verify check. On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Yes, that definitely works. Wanted to know if there's a switch for file > output or not. > > On 21 October 2017 at 23:45, 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: >

...in attending the meetup (in Hyderabad). IMHO we can start with Meetup and select a city. How are Meetups expenses generally handled elsewhere ? Regards,Pankaj Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:59:21 +0530 From: Madhur Amilkanthwar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> To: Siddharth Bhat <siddu.druid at gmail.com> Cc: Siddharth Shankar Swain <h2015096 at pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in>,     llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, llvm-dev-request at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Meetup/Social in India Message-ID:     <CAMTh1gWv5gvD61u4EkPu7gz9hV2A2iAy9-k2K5xhWgjZ4vcKRw...

...an hierarchical clustering method of your choice. Plot the related dendrogram. Use the R functions hclust()and dist() (as well as function daisy()) I am new to this forum as well. I hope you guys help out in finishing this project. Please let me know if any further information is needed. Thanks Siddu -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-on-heatmap-K-means-and-hhierarchical-clustering-methods-tp2318085p2318085.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

You can attach debug info to the Llvm module about LLVM IR, at which point one can throw the executable into any debugger and get llvm level debugging. I've started a patch to revive this feature (DebugIR pass). I've been sidetracked the past month, but I'll come back to it soon :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D40778 Cheers, Siddharth On Thu 4 Jan, 2018, 09:23 Brenda So via llvm-dev,

Hi I am looking at open projects that LLVM want to implement and it seems to be a suggestion to write an LLVM IR level debugger. Is there any existing LLVM projects out there that already does such a thing? If not, I would like to try implementing one myself. By debugger, I think it means something like gdb, where you can insert breakpoints, run code and observe layout of registers and memory at

Hey, Alternatively, expose a SCEVExpander::getInsertPoint? This would proxy the underlying IRbuilder, with no real state sharing, other than the current insert point. This will be less ugly than recieving the expanded SCEV value, casting to an instruction, and feeding this to the IRBuilder. Cheers, siddharth On Thu 3 May, 2018, 15:36 Philip Pfaffe via llvm-dev, < llvm-dev at

...nderstand what you've done better. >From first glance, my idea is slight different because your code interfaces with gdb and lldb while i'm more interested in making the debugger itself (sort of an extended interpreter). Yours, Brenda On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Siddharth Bhat <siddu.druid at gmail.com> wrote: > You can attach debug info to the Llvm module about LLVM IR, at which point > one can throw the executable into any debugger and get llvm level debugging. > > I've started a patch to revive this feature (DebugIR pass). I've been > sidetracked t...

Hi Alex, Sanjoy, exposing the internal IRBuilder to users of SCEVExpander violates information hiding, and encourages the tight coupling that makes code bases such as Polly so hard to maintain. SCEVExpander::expandCodeFor returns a Value that (if it's an instruction) can be used to update the insert point of the client's IRBuilder. Is that not enough? No hidden state, no hidden state

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Siddharth Bhat via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I could be entirely wrong, but from my understanding of memorySSA, each > def defines an "abstract heap state" which has the coarsest possible > definition - any write will be modelled as a "new heap state". > This is true for def-def relationships, but

Hi, My mails were working with the earlier version of rails ie. Rails 2.0.2. But recently when i upgraded my environment to 2.3.2 the mails stopped working and gave "Error: End of file reached". But if i send mails independent of my rails app the mailing code works fine. My Environment: Windows Xp Ruby 1.8.7 actionmailer (2.3.2) actionpack (2.3.2) activerecord (2.3.2) activeresource