search for: sht_dwarf64

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > For .debug_* in object files: > > > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > > > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably > > should also be SHT_DWARF64. > > If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. > > I am not really sure that we n...

...Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >>> >>>On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>>>For .debug_* in object files: >>>> >>>>DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >>>>DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 >>>> >>>>In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If >>>>all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably >>>>should also be SHT_DWARF64. >>>>If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. >>&...

...2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >> > >> > On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >> > > For .debug_* in object files: >> > > >> > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >> > > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 >> > > >> > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If >> > > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably >> > > should also be SHT_DWARF64. >> > > If mixed, SHT_PROGB...

...Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >>> >>>On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>>>For .debug_* in object files: >>>> >>>>DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >>>>DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 >>>> >>>>In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If >>>>all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably >>>>should also be SHT_DWARF64. >>>>If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. >>&...

...t; On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> > wrote: > > > > On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > > For .debug_* in object files: > > > > > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > > > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > > > > > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > > > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably > > > should also be SHT_DWARF64. > > > If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. > > >...

...this. > > OK - thanks for clarifying. I don't really know much/enough about > linker scripts to comment on the rest of the design, and was just > confused/misunderstanding what was being suggested. For .debug_* in object files: DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably should also be SHT_DWARF64. If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. FWIW I started a generic-abi thread https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/i2Xio-47Qd...

On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > For .debug_* in object files: > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably > should also be SHT_DWARF64. > If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. I am not really sure that we need a new section type. This gets...

...Sòng wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >> >> On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>> For .debug_* in object files: >>> >>> DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >>> DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 >>> >>> In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If >>> all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably >>> should also be SHT_DWARF64. >>> If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. >> >> I am no...

...udrin at accesssoftek.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > >> > > For .debug_* in object files: > >> > > > >> > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > >> > > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > >> > > > >> > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > >> > > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably > >> > > should also be SHT_DWARF64. > >> >...

...this. > > OK - thanks for clarifying. I don't really know much/enough about > linker scripts to comment on the rest of the design, and was just > confused/misunderstanding what was being suggested. For .debug_* in object files: DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably should also be SHT_DWARF64. If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. FWIW I started a generic-abi thread https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/i2Xio-47Qd...

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:17 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:05 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > > > > I got replies from Nick Clifton and Michael Matz: > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-November/114116.html > > (and its reply). > > I have mentioned (a) the difficulty