Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "sht_dwarf32_dwarf64".
2020 Nov 17
0
[EXTERNAL] Re: [LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...clarity and not ambiguity, I would suggest considering the
following. The DWARF specs designed so that the data of DWARF32 and
DWARF64 formats can be intermixed together in one section. What section
type should be used for that combination? Should it be another new
section type, something like SHT_DWARF32_DWARF64? Probably not, that
should be a regular SHT_PROGBITS. That means that DWARF64 data can be
contained in a SHT_PROGBITS section. Consequently, the section which
contains DWARF64 data without DWARF32 data should also be SHT_PROGBITS,
because the latter is just a special case of the former.
> F...
2020 Nov 17
5
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ambiguity, I would suggest considering the
> following. The DWARF specs designed so that the data of DWARF32 and
> DWARF64 formats can be intermixed together in one section. What section
> type should be used for that combination? Should it be another new
> section type, something like SHT_DWARF32_DWARF64? Probably not, that
> should be a regular SHT_PROGBITS. That means that DWARF64 data can be
> contained in a SHT_PROGBITS section. Consequently, the section which
> contains DWARF64 data without DWARF32 data should also be SHT_PROGBITS,
> because the latter is just a special case of the...
2020 Nov 18
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ing the
>> > following. The DWARF specs designed so that the data of DWARF32 and
>> > DWARF64 formats can be intermixed together in one section. What section
>> > type should be used for that combination? Should it be another new
>> > section type, something like SHT_DWARF32_DWARF64? Probably not, that
>> > should be a regular SHT_PROGBITS. That means that DWARF64 data can be
>> > contained in a SHT_PROGBITS section. Consequently, the section which
>> > contains DWARF64 data without DWARF32 data should also be SHT_PROGBITS,
>> > because the...
2020 Nov 17
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...suggest considering the
> > following. The DWARF specs designed so that the data of DWARF32 and
> > DWARF64 formats can be intermixed together in one section. What section
> > type should be used for that combination? Should it be another new
> > section type, something like SHT_DWARF32_DWARF64? Probably not, that
> > should be a regular SHT_PROGBITS. That means that DWARF64 data can be
> > contained in a SHT_PROGBITS section. Consequently, the section which
> > contains DWARF64 data without DWARF32 data should also be SHT_PROGBITS,
> > because the latter is just a...
2020 Nov 18
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...; following. The DWARF specs designed so that the data of DWARF32 and
> >> > DWARF64 formats can be intermixed together in one section. What
> section
> >> > type should be used for that combination? Should it be another new
> >> > section type, something like SHT_DWARF32_DWARF64? Probably not, that
> >> > should be a regular SHT_PROGBITS. That means that DWARF64 data can be
> >> > contained in a SHT_PROGBITS section. Consequently, the section which
> >> > contains DWARF64 data without DWARF32 data should also be
> SHT_PROGBITS,
> &...
2020 Nov 13
4
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:29 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:24 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:17 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:05 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:
>