search for: shreyas76

done http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5331 shrey On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> writes: > >>     I am running into bunch of windows build issues. Can someone >> please provide help on what might be going wrong >> >> >> llvm\win32\Configure\..\llvm\ADT\hash_set.h >> 1>The system cannot find the file specified. >>...

...for the help ..I could build it with cmake generated project files Being a newbie with cmake one question, is it equivalent to configure in windows environment and so would need to be run everytime I change the source location ? thanks shrey On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > done > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5331 > > shrey > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> writes: >> >>>     I am running into bun...

...y_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && "Table isn't big enough!"); What does the assertion mean ? thanks for all help!! shrey On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >>   I find  types such as v16i32, v16f32  missing in my llvm version 2.7 >> >> So does the following page not list them >> http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1MVT.html >> >> is that intentional for any reason or can...

Hi I am running into bunch of windows build issues. Can someone please provide help on what might be going wrong llvm\win32\Configure\..\llvm\ADT\hash_set.h 1>The system cannot find the file specified. Similarly 2>c1xx : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: '..\..\lib\Support\Annotation.cpp': No such file or directory thanks in advance shrey

Hi As part of a requirement that I have, I would like to have some globals reside in registers always. So these variables would not have a home location in memory. I realize the code generated would also need to be aware of this. I do have some ideas on how to change the code appropriately. But right now, I am more concerned about how to fit this requirement (sort of interprocedural) into the

...t available. thanks again shrey On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin<jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > Chris recently wrote up a way to do this at > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/GlobalRegisterVariables.txt > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, shreyas krishnan<shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >>   As part of a requirement that I have, I would like to have some >> globals reside in registers always. So these variables would not have >> a home location in memory. >> I realize the code generated would also need to be aware of this...

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:41 PM, shreyas krishnan<shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Eli, Jaffrey for the pointer! > > A couple of further questions if I may > 1. Isnt this assuming that register being pinned to is always esi when > it comes to using a calling convention. You'd need a separate calling convention for each possible...

shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> writes: > I am running into bunch of windows build issues. Can someone > please provide help on what might be going wrong > > > llvm\win32\Configure\..\llvm\ADT\hash_set.h > 1>The system cannot find the file specified. > > Similarly > 2>c1xx :...

Hi I find types such as v16i32, v16f32 missing in my llvm version 2.7 So does the following page not list them http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1MVT.html is that intentional for any reason or can I just add them ? thanks shrey

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:48 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi >   I find  types such as v16i32, v16f32  missing in my llvm version 2.7 > > So does the following page not list them > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1MVT.html > > is that intentional for any reason or can I just add them  ? As far...

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > I tried adding them in my backend however I run into the assertion > >  assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < sizeof(LoadExtActions[0])*4 && >           ExtType < array_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && >           "Table isn't big enough!&...

...wrong ? I can see a different assert where it clearly depends on LAST_VALUETYPE assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE thanks shrey On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: >> I tried adding them in my backend however I run into the assertion >> >>  assert((unsigned)VT.SimpleTy < sizeof(LoadExtActions[0])*4 && >>           ExtType < array_lengthof(LoadExtActions) && >>           "Table is...

Hi all I am building LLVM 2.6 on VC++. I am running into this problem where even builds without any changes whatsoever causes rebuilding of certain directories like table gen of intrinsics and x86 target files. This then leads to build of the x86 codegen. Is this expected ? Any pointers to how I can avoid this? thanks shrey

Chris recently wrote up a way to do this at http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/GlobalRegisterVariables.txt On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, shreyas krishnan<shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi >   As part of a requirement that I have, I would like to have some > globals reside in registers always. So these variables would not have > a home location in memory. > I realize the code generated would also need to be aware of this. I do > have som...

Hi I run into an issue as part of splitting a critical edge during LICM. When a new basic block is created and needs to be added into the dominator tree, the block is already in the dominator tree. I print the dominator tree and I see it is added into the tree as child of node it is supposed to dominate. How do I debug to find out why/when its getting added into the tree. ? Tips/suggestions on

Hi I would like to add transformation - mostly peephole- after register allocation that make use of def-use information. Would it be possible to make use of the dag codebase to help do that ? thanks for any pointers shrey

Hi I have a couple of questions on lli/jit. If someone give me pointers, it would be much appreciated. I would like to find out what the different passes from the target -if target is available- that get executed when lli is invoked. Is the pipeline similar to llc ? Does it have a fast mode as well? thanks in advance shrey

thanks for the help ..I do add the chain and the result. My code is like this ... SDValue Ops[] = { load->getChain(), load->getOperand(1), load->getBasePtr(), des }; DAG.getNode(CustomOpc, NodeTys, Ops, 4); thanks again! shrey On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> My problem is that the second call asserts inside

...ue would also be resolved if you did a full make clean. The problem was in a particular situation where every build would essentially invalidate the table gen outputs, but not actually update them, so the build never resolved itself. - Daniel On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM, shreyas krishnan <shreyas76 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all >   I am building LLVM 2.6 on VC++. I am running into this problem > where even builds without any changes whatsoever causes rebuilding of > certain directories like table gen of intrinsics and x86 target files. > This then leads to build of the x86 c...

hi I find machine register info carrying the lists of def use for each register - PhysRegUseDefLists[RegNo];. I dont see a lot of places using this. For instance, if this list is accurate, can this be used for def use relationships at different points? thanks shrey