search for: show_

...ee search in my index html. I am able to show the parents, with no issue, but the children will not show. I have something like this for the parent, which displays fine: <% for group in Group.roots %> <td> <tr> <a href="#" onclick="Effect.BlindDown(''show_<%= group.id%>'');return false;">+</a> <!-- calls the show method, but utilizes the acts_as_tree --> <%= link_to (group.name), group %> <br> <div id ="show_<%= group.id%>" style="display:none;"> For the child...

How can I know if a an element is visible or hidden in RJS I''m trying to hide/show some data but it does not work Error => parse error, unexpected $undefined. #show_doctor.rjs if($("#{@element}").visible()) page.hide "hide_#{@element}" end Any ideas? @element contains the value of the html element -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...: ld returned 1 exit status >> specmake: *** [namd] Error 1 >> >> >> On 5 November 2012 14:32, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr >> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: >> >> Hi Anitha, >> >> >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.**__cgi?id=14185<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.__cgi?id=14185> >> >> <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_**bug.cgi?id=14185<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185> >> > >> I am stuck on analysis. Does any one have alternate suggestions >&gt...

...gt; > On 5 November 2012 14:32, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr> > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>>> wrote: > > Hi Anitha, > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.____cgi?id=14185 > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.__cgi?id=14185> > > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show___bug.cgi?id=14185 > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185>> > I am stuck on analysis. Does any one have alter...

Hi All, I have a fix to this bug ( https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16454) and would like to submit a patch to the bug report on Bugzilla. I'd also like to start going through some of the other Windows-specific issues and start fixing those. The bug submission instructions indicate that I should ask here for a Bugzilla account. Is that still the corre...

For example, I have the following IR code, for.cond.preheader: ; preds = %if.end18 %mul = mul i32 %12, %3 %cmp21128 = icmp sgt i32 %mul, 0 br i1 %cmp21128, label %for.body.preheader, label %return for.body.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond.preheader %19 = mul i32 %12, %3 %20 = add i32 %19, -1 %21 = zext i32 %20 to i64 %22 =

Hi Anitha, On 05/11/12 10:29, Anitha Boyapati wrote: > > > On 5 November 2012 14:32, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > > Hi Anitha, > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.__cgi?id=14185 > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185> > I am stuck on analysis. Does any one have alternate suggestions on debugging > llvm? (Please refer to comments for the work done so far) > > > try to reduce a small standalone test...

..."write_zeroes_max_bytes", .mode = 0444 }, .show = queue_write_zeroes_max_show, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = { - .attr = {.name = "rotational", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR }, + .attr = {.name = "rotational", .mode = 0644 }, .show = queue_show_nonrot, .store = queue_store_nonrot, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_zoned_entry = { - .attr = {.name = "zoned", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = {.name = "zoned", .mode = 0444 }, .show = queue_zoned_show, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nomerges_entry =...

..."write_zeroes_max_bytes", .mode = 0444 }, .show = queue_write_zeroes_max_show, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = { - .attr = {.name = "rotational", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR }, + .attr = {.name = "rotational", .mode = 0644 }, .show = queue_show_nonrot, .store = queue_store_nonrot, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_zoned_entry = { - .attr = {.name = "zoned", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = {.name = "zoned", .mode = 0444 }, .show = queue_zoned_show, }; static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nomerges_entry =...

On 5 November 2012 14:32, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Anitha, > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.**cgi?id=14185<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185> >> I am stuck on analysis. Does any one have alternate suggestions on >> debugging >> llvm? (Please refer to comments for the work done so far) >> > > try to reduce a small standalone testcase which is...

FWIW, I've raised the LICM issue here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37682 On 31 May 2018 at 13:28, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > These are very helpful. > > As I understand it, SROA and LICM render some variables > "useless" by optimizing the code to not use them. Hence we can't debug &...

....apicdrivers);` as well. > Actually, quickly staring at the code, the `*(.apicdrivers);` seems like it will be lexed correctly. -- Sean Silva > This is not the first bug related to lexing that we have run into (e.g. > lexing `.=` as a single token is the cause of https://llvm.org/bugs/show_ > bug.cgi?id=31128 ). > > -- Sean Silva > > >> >> >Finally the kernel was built and it obviously didn't run (only printed >> out "No setup signature found..." but this is some result as well). >> >Probably, the result could be better if the...

..._builtin_iceil' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > specmake: *** [namd] Error 1 > > > On 5 November 2012 14:32, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > > Hi Anitha, > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.__cgi?id=14185 > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185> > I am stuck on analysis. Does any one have alternate suggestions on debugging > llvm? (Please refer to comments for the work done so far) > > > try to reduce a small standalone test...

Hi Reid, On 26/08/13 23:43, Reid Kleckner wrote: > To implement http://llvm.org/PR16959 > <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16959>, I need to add a new field to > global_ctors. > > Static data members of class template instantiations can have initializers that > must only run once on program startup. Itanium solves this with guard variables > and the emission of multiple initializers, only o...

Hi Sanjay, On 19 Jul 2016, at 18:54, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com<mailto:spatel at rotateright.com>> wrote: Hi Artur - I don't think there's any reason to limit the transform to sexts only; that's just the case that was apparent in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20134 , so I limited it to that pattern. It's probably worth noting that I'm currently fighting through casts of all kinds in IR (InstCombine) rather than the backend: What is the current status of this work? Does it make sense to patch the existing code in X86ISelLowering in ord...

...analysis), but to use it, you have to examine the points-to graphs (called DSGraphs) it generates directly. If you want to go that route, we can help you with that. If you're interested in having an AliasAnalysis interface to DSA, you can make a note under Bug 11130 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11130). There's at least one other person that wants it; I'm using the bug report to measure the level of interest in this feature so that we can prioritize it properly. We do accept patches for the poolalloc project, so if you want to make the Steensgaard code work and submi...

...ment, so that information can be used to optimize the caller as well. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! I don't know if that will actually solve our sub-optimal output >>>> for dyn_cast (!), but it might help... >>>> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_>https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug >>>> .cgi?id=28430 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Example: >>>>> >>>>> define i1 @bar(i32* nonnull %x) { ; %x must be non-null in this >&...

Hi, This is Jiesheng Wei from UBC. Now I am working on a project with LLVM and I want to use steensgaard alias analysis tool. I saw on the website that steensgaard analysis is available for LLVM 2.9 and it is under poolalloc/ directory. I downloaded several versions but none of them is compatible with LLVM 2.9. Can you please tell me which version of poolalloc is for LLVM 2.9? Thanks, Jiesheng

...ation can be used to optimize the caller as well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! I don't know if that will actually solve our sub-optimal >>>>> output for dyn_cast (!), but it might help... >>>>> <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_>https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug >>>>> .cgi?id=28430 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Example: >>>>>> >>>>>> define i1 @bar(i32* nonnull %x) {...

To implement http://llvm.org/PR16959<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16959>, I need to add a new field to global_ctors. Static data members of class template instantiations can have initializers that must only run once on program startup. Itanium solves this with guard variables and the emission of multiple initializers, only one of which actually ini...