search for: shoving

Running Asterisk Head 1.0.9. Below is a trace of a call delivered to my system which had no caller ID. For some reason, dialparties.agi shoves the incoming provider's IP address into the caller ID so you never have a call that is screened for PrivacyDirector. Is anyone else seeing this issue as well? Have I missed a patch? This call shows on the display with a name of "Unknown"

I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror, I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a PERC 5 controller - I think that's what the dead one had. I fired up MegaRAID storage manager... but can't see any way to tell it to recreate that RAID. Anyone

I've been asked to try and get an old program running on one of the newer machines so we can lose the windows 98 machine. so shoved the floppy in, got it started to install in wine no problems, however midway through installation I get "error, unable to install font" now I've shoved the 98 hard disk in the machine, and copied everything in the font folder to the font folder on

In r226336 I shove off 1.2 seconds out of 9.8 seconds for lld to link lld. That's done by parallelizing archive member parsing. But I realized that was not the slowest pass. The single slowest pass in LLD is LayoutPass. Only sort() at the last of Layoutpass::perform takes about 3 seconds (one third of total execution time). It is because the comparison function passed to sort, compareAtoms,

Running CentOS 5 (long story, will be updated some day). A 5 yr old Dell PE R415. Whoever spec'd the order, they got the cheapest, embedded controller. Push came to shove - these things gag on a drive > 2TB. So, we bought some PERC H200's for it, and its two mates. This morning, I brought the system down, and put in the card, and moved the SATA cables. This did not end well. The new

Hi, I'm trying to migrate from uw imapd to dovecot. I'm having two problems at the moment. 1. uw imapd grabs new mail from /var/mail/user and then shoves it into ~/mbox, is there any way to make dovecot handle this kind of setup or am I better off merging ~/mbox back into /var/mail/user? If merging is better are what tools are best for this? 2. While I did have have everything in

...ers. These tuners will get existing FM stations programs. Then, i want to broadcast these programs at the same time on internet with 2 or more softwares' combination liveice/icecast or liveice/shoutcast. In my opinion, the only solution to do that is to take the dsp devices of the FM-tuners and shoving them into liveice directly (no use of the dsp device of the soundcard). Is it possible? And if it is, could you help me to do that? Thanks, Bertrand. -------------- Jusqu'à 60 heures gratuites pour toute souscription à l'un des nouveaux Forfaits Liberty Surf http://register.liberty...

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 16:43 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams via samba wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 16:28 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams via samba > wrote: > > > > sernet-samba-4.2.14-23.el6.x86_64 > > Errors [on all DCs] related to incorrect userParameters values - on > > user's that are working.  How does one go about > > rebuilding/correcting > > this

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Thanks! This is all very interesting, and tells me that LLVM has a > way to go to fully support all of these capabilities (if that is the > right thing to do, which isn't clear). OTOH, it looks like a lot of > real-world software that is using LLVM already doesn't seem to be > affected by

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la <at> mega-nerd.com> writes: > > Collin wrote: > > > Has anyone encountered a similar problem, or are there any known issues that > > could explain this? > > No known issues of this kind, but I would like to see a repeatable test > case so I can investigate further. > > Cheers, > Erik It turns out it was an error

Once upon a time, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> said: > Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init > system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to > init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming > include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than > M$-style

Hello again! I took a stab at PR4898[1]. The attached patch improves Clang's __builtin_constant_p support so that the Linux kernel is happy. With this improvement, Clang can determine if __builtin_constant_p is true or false after inlining. As an example: static __attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(int x) { if (__builtin_constant_p(x)) return 1; return 0; } static

...r edges are viable or not. You're allowed to incorrectly > optimistic results in the midst of the algorithm run (by design). > Yes, but, again, you still can't shove things back up the lattice :) Maybe this will help: In the past, the resolver forced things to be constant. This is shoving them down the lattice too far. There was, as i said no way to push them back up the lattice when they turned out wrong (and this happened often due to the iteration order differences). If you want to do the stuff the resolver did, but do it at the right time, you need the bit to tell you when you...

Hi all, I have just upgraded to a new satellite internet provider. I have two network cards - one with a public IP connected to my satellite router, and the second network card with private IP into my switch for the LAN. Shorewall firewall My old satellite system is not being used. Would it be possible/feasable to install a third network card into my Fedora Core 2 server, and then direct all

Hello. I have a question. We run a number of public service audio streams. They are picking up in popularity, and it would be nice to take some credit for the bandwidth we are supplying. Lots of people directly linking to us. So I would like to attempt to do something that I've seen done with WMA streams. I would like it so when a listener connects, it plays back a 20 second audio clip

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, March 25, 2016 9:55 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I don't think I've seen this with CentOS 6 or 5, but I had to repair an >> external RAID box this morning. The server, running CentOS 7, has an >> LSI HBA card in it, and it's presented to the system as /dev/sdb. >> I shut off the RAID controller, powered it off, >

...atch mitigates the damage on Bloomfield... > > patched 3.6svn 1073.69+/-1.97 > > so we are only regressing the benchmark 24% rather than 39% there. > Jack > This still all begs the question of what exact metrics exist for the Q/A of llvm releases? IMHO, the bad PR from shoving out compiler releases with severe performance regressions in the generated code far outweighs a brief delay to triage these issues as much as possible. Jack > >> Do you seriously want to ship with a 39% performance regression in a >> major benchmark? >>...

...the IR's DICompileUnit/DISubprogram links. r107027 effectively forces us to hold onto subprogram definitions that describe deleted functions. This seems quite weird to me :/. I'm talking to people internally and hoping to find that we just don't care anymore. Even if we do, perhaps shoving these types into 'retainedTypes:' in `DICompileUnit` (only if -gkeep-all-types or some such) will solve the problem for the ctfconvert use case (without burdening others). While I sort that out... does anyone else rely on this? How? Why? (The attach patch effectively reverts r107027.)...

Hi! Is there any reason why support for the libwrap code isn't included in the X11 forwarding code? I'd like to restrict access to that port. How many applications would break if the tcp port would be closed and only the unix-domain socket would be available? It's true that x11 forwardings can be considered as a security risk and they are disabled because of that by default. I

We are looking for a good firewall replacement which will basically do pot blocking and QOS. Our current solution just plain stinks.. We basically need to handle the traffic of a few web servers, mail server and asterisk box. The most traffic this device will need to handle is what can be shoved through a T1. I don't mind buying an appliance to get something solid but IP Cop just looks