search for: shouldupgradex86intrinsic

...d signature. x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. 3.3 had no upgrades 3.4 removed: x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170920/5b5df0bf/attachment.html>

...gument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't > have any tests for the old signature. > > 3.3 had no upgrades > > 3.4 removed: > x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it > > For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated > list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp > > ~Craig > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrub...

...We don't >> have any tests for the old signature. >> >> 3.3 had no upgrades >> >> 3.4 removed: >> x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it >> >> For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated >> list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp >> >> ~Craig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> > -------------- next part --...

...n argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. > > 3.3 had no upgrades > > 3.4 removed: > x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it > > For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp > > ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170921/c1c236a0/attachment.html>

...d signature. x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature. 3.3 had no upgrades 3.4 removed: x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp ~Craig _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrub...

...gument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't > have any tests for the old signature. > > 3.3 had no upgrades > > 3.4 removed: > x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it > > For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated > list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic in AutoUpgrade.cpp > > ~Craig > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attac...