Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "should_have_rj".
Did you mean:
should_have_rjs
2007 Jun 15
2
Is it still possible to use should_have_rjs
...pe effect
/Users/ashleymoran/Documents/Development/YourMoney/trunk/src/spec/
views/admin/add_dealer_rjs_view_spec.rb:33
31
32 it "should have visual effect" do
33 response.should have_rjs(:effect, :blind_down, "add_dealer")
34 end
35
I''m trying to revert these to should_have_rjs but I''ve looked through
the RSpec source and it seems should_have_rjs was silently removed
between 0.8 and 0.9. At least I can''t find any reference to it in
the 0.9.4 source or the 1.0.5 source. Am I missing something? I
really need should_have_rjs- those 53 failures r...
2007 Feb 13
1
RJS specs
...partial and test like this:
context "A rendered gap/product_info" do
specify "should have RJS to update the product_info div" do
assigns[:product_partial] = "product_info_rti"
render ''gap/product_info''
response.should_have_rjs :replace_html, ''product_info''
end
%w[ rti finance ].each do |product_type|
specify "should have a product_info_#{product_type} div when
the " do
assigns[:product_partial] = "product_info_#{product_type}"
render &...
2007 Jan 25
0
Testing RJS select method
Hi
How can I test this kind of RJS code?
page.select ''#id .class''.each do |element|
element.removeClassName(''whatever'')
end
I know that should_have_rjs admits a block, but i don''t know exactly
which is its purpose.
And I can test that the "select" part is beign called, but I don''t
know hot to test the "removeClassName" part.
Thanks in advance.