Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "should_be_working_like_rubi".
Did you mean:
should_be_working_like_ruby
2006 Oct 17
0
actual.should != not_expected
All,
In dealing with the changes to should in the
should_be_working_like_ruby branch, I am reminded that while we got
the following to work ...
actual.should_be < value
actual.should_be <= value
actual.should == value
actual.should =~ value
actual.should_be >= value
actual.should_be > value
... we were not able to get this to work:
actual.should != value
Here''s what the
2006 Oct 17
0
new handling of equality
All,
Based mostly on the earlier thread on "should_be", we have introduced
a new branch called should_be_working_like_ruby with the new proposed
handling for equality.
Per the CHANGES file in that branch (rev 896):
============================================
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS RELEASE IS NOT 100% BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE TO 0.6.x
This release changes the way RSpec handles equality.