search for: shortcomming

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hadmut Danisch wrote: > astonished to see, what problems come with Maildir++ and how complicated > dovecot tries to deal with them. .. [fast fwd to "solution"] > INBOX -> ~/mail/inbox > abc -> ~/mail/abc > abc/def -> ~/mail/abc.dir/def or ~/mail/___abc___/def This would not work. For example, how would you handle a folder

Hello, Sorry for a bit offtopic but it seems the bogofilter community is just as dead as dspam is. I trying to switch from DSPAM to bogofilter on a server where if I turn bogofilter on I run into the following issue: Certain users have sender and recipient bcc maps setup in postfix. This is for forwarding copy of an email to other address for example: Incoming lclude at company.com ->

Op 6/15/2017 om 12:19 PM schreef Luescher Claude: > I have +vnd.dovecot.duplicate plugin enabled but it seems to be > ineffective. Any other tips for a workaround? > Enabling that extension does nothing by itself. You need to add a corresponding rule to your Sieve script. Also, that is the deprecated name for that extension. It is explained fully here:

Hello, Yes but how to activate this for all users, not on a per user basis or without writing out thousands of sieve files to users directories. Thank you. On 2017-06-15 13:33, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 6/15/2017 om 12:19 PM schreef Luescher Claude: >> I have +vnd.dovecot.duplicate plugin enabled but it seems to be >> ineffective. Any other tips for a workaround? >> >

> Sounds more like you just introduced a new self-created problem that would require yet another workaround.. ;-) Definitely wrong. Appending .dir to directories and .folder to folder files keeps files completely distinct and name collissions are not possible. > But what was not clear from your mail, is what exactly you identified as "the problems" with standard Maildir++

Hi, When clang/llvm compiles the following sample (with -O2) it optimizes away the second comparison in test1 but not in test2. Is this handling of 'unreachable' by purpose, or is this just a shortcoming of the current optimization passes? GCC and MSVC (with the equivalent code using the __assume intrinsic) both optimize away the comparison in test2. void f1(); void f2(); void

Re-sent copying UNON and Expand Technologies. Apologies for the omission. Rgds, Alphonse On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Alphonse Ogulla <aogulla at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Esther, > > The foregoing mail notes sent to Expand Technology refer, in view that you > were not copied in the initial correspondence. > > We were hoping that Expand Technology would make a

Hi, I am trying to deal with the problem, that under regular mbox format a path can lead to either a file or a directory, but not both, while under IMAP, a path is usually both, a message folder containing subfolders. I found dovecot's approach to this problem, the Maildir++ layout described under http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders , and was astonished to see, what problems come with

Dear colleagues! In early 2009 there was a discussion about fast BLAS library initiated by Sachin. He reported a faster BLAS library made by Nvidia CUBLAS library. Uwe Ligges showed an interest for placing the optimized rblas.dll into windows/contrib section managed by him. Unfortunately there is no any CUBLAS version of rblas.dll in this section at present. So, is anybody interested in CUBLAS

On Oct 24, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Stephan Tolksdorf <st at quanttec.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When clang/llvm compiles the following sample (with -O2) it optimizes away the second comparison in test1 but not in test2. Is this handling of 'unreachable' by purpose, or is this just a shortcoming of the current optimization passes? GCC and MSVC (with the equivalent code using the

What is the recommended way to get a front-end to run on Windows? I have been able to successfully compile on Linux. I'm worried about documents stating all the shortcomings of the Visual Studio compiled version, but I do have mingw. Is there a guide for using mingw to compile? I thought about compiling to IR, but the documentation said the language is not stable.

Hello all, For some years now, I've been using Thunderbird for dovecot. I am not very satisfied with t/b so I thought of using m/s outlook but then I thought that I want to distance my clients from office products. I have a newly created dovecot installation on a very small site. Three nodes, all x86 Windows 7 professional with an ubuntu v14.04 server (x86 again) running dovecot 1.2.17.

Hi all, I thought that readers of R-Help might find the following article at ScienceNews of interest: Odds Are, It's Wrong Science fails to face the shortcomings of statistics By Tom Siegfried March 27th, 2010; Vol.177 #7 (p. 26) http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/57091/title/Odds_are,_its_wrong Regards, Marc Schwartz

I, like many of you, have been searching for a good way to handle running long processes in Rails. So I rolled my own solution. I really want feedback! (I''ve tested this on very simple hello world examples, so don''t use it on anything production yet) . Grab the plugin: http://opensvn.csie.org/rails_cron Here''s the README: OVERVIEW ======== RailsCron is a way to

This fast-track covers the SMF-related changes for dom0. This is a final draft, so any comments by the end of the week please... Man pages are attached. thanks john SMF services for Xen 1. Introduction This case introduces the SMF services used by a Solaris-based domain 0 when running on Xen, or a Xen-compatible hypervisor. All of these services only run on domain 0 when booted

> > That might be true. However, the main problem I see with this is > > that by using only the codecs as the extension you make it > > impossible to filter for audio/video without knowing all the codecs. > > You cannot easily do file searches without specifying all those > > extensions either. > > > Nor can filter audio/video without specifying all of `wma`,

Has anyone written a better AMD than the default AMD? The existing AMD works great but it has a few shortcomings... I do know about Sangoma but am just looking for a better AMD module. Thanks, John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100526/df39406f/attachment.htm

So there seem to be some shortcomings in NTFS, still. 1. Symlinks are not supported. Proper symlinks exist in NTFS since Vista, so we should support them. 2. readdir() seems to be broken. I have been using the following test load to generate disk images: http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/syslinux/exttest-20140521.tar.xz Anyone who has been involved with the NTFS code who has a chance to take a

CRAN, by relying on the powerful package management system that is part of R, provides an unparalleled framework for extending R with nearly 20k packages. We recently encountered an issue that highlights a missing element in the otherwise outstanding package management system. So we would like to start a discussion about enhancing its feature set. As shown below, a mechanism to force

I have an * system running version 1.0.8 and it works mostly fine. I am using it as a virtual PBX and we share the box among companies. I have the calls all staying separate, we well as the companies' extensions, voicemail, etc. The only problem I'm having is with two accounts that use the same SIP termination provider. * seems to be confusing the sip contexts for the incoming calls.