search for: shooling

I have a doubt. What''s the correct use of mangle for the next network: eth0: 200.39.190.249 (public) eth1: 192.168.101.254 (private) I make nat with iptables and have the following htb script: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 15kbit ceil 10mbit

> > just so you know, --enable-vorbis-updates is only a compile flag for the KH > > branch, not the mainline trunk. And I think it would be great to have this > > code be factored out of KH and integrated into the mainline trunk...This > > also seems like an odd thing to have as a compile flag, what was the > > motivation for that ? oddsock > That switch

I still don't think the exp(lp)/(1+exp(lp)) gonna work. Since this is conditional logit model, while this formula is only used in unconditional ones. By using this, one neglects the information based on stratum. Though I don't know how to solve it to. I am also working on a project on this and I do hope there's someone explaining this problem. Will that be a possibility that the phat

hi, i keep on fighting with balancing my two internet conections.. ive improved a routing like this: root@debian:/wk/ESTADISTICAS/Trafico_en_kisero_hq# ip route list 172.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.0.0.82 172.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 172.0.0.81 default nexthop via 172.0.0.1 dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 172.0.0.1 dev eth1

Sending my son back to college with a dual-boot laptop with Win 7 and CentOS 5.5. He uses Win7 to manage his iPod and SW that sometimes issued by a professor for a specific course...otherwise he uses CentOS for everything else. That setup worked well last year, except for printing. He has a low-end Cannon printer that is not supported in the Linux realm. Most of his coursework was uploaded to

Hi, Please suppose following config: Two external interfaces for two different providers On each of them configured NAT for specific IP addr. ie. 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 1.1.1.30/30 brd 1.1.1.31 scope global eth2 6: eth4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 inet 2.2.2.66/27 brd 2.2.2.95 scope global eth4 On eth2

Hi, Hopefully this won''t be too off-topic (I''ve seen both bonding & vlan mentioned on the list, but not really together). I''ve tried to get bonding (2 x 100Mb EEPro, but will want to try on 1000BaseT) and vlans to work together, but without luck. I can get them working fine (seemingly at least - I didn''t tried bursting on the bonded port) individually.