search for: shoehorned

Mike, Generally "Invalid mode encounterd" == "frames are misaligned" You should be getting 20 bytes from the encoder each time, and passing 20 bytes to the decoder each time. Is it correct that you have modeled your main loop after testenc-TI-c5x.c? If you look at encoded silence with a binary editor, you should be able to see the 20-byte repetition pattern. You can also

Jean-Marc was correct in that the 16bit value was the culprit for my encoding woes. after I changed that to a 32 bit value I believe it encodes correctly, but I really don't have much of any way to know this absolutely. I am using the 1.2beta2. I would use the enctest program, I have looked it over and based a lot of what I am doing on that code but the project I am developing this on is

I thought I should be getting 20 words because in the windows app the command line repeats "nbBytes = 20" through the entire decode phase. I wonder how the frames got misaligned...right now I get 10 words of data followed by 10 words of 0's which I look at through a memory window in code composer. now I am pretty sure there is a terminator word that gets in there so that would make

This is going to take some explaining and I apologize in advance if any of this is found in the manual or sample code but I couldn't find it. I just graduated last may and this is my first experience with vocoders and dissecting a professional's code. I work for a company that is currently using a G729A vocoder from a 3rd party software company and is looking into speex so they no

+1 to alive2.llvm.org On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:11 AM John Regehr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > If we can get Alive1 up there too, that would be even better. I still > > use that to try to prove things where it's not obvious how to express > > the relationships in pure LLVM IR: > > https://rise4fun.com/Alive/NDu > > I don't

Hi, I would like to know if there are any plans to introduce a creation timestamp in future ext3/4 versions. Having a 4th timestamp saving the creation time would be very good for projekts like Samba for example. It would be important that creation time can also be set manually later on by some system call. Systems like FreeBSD's UFS and Solais' ZFS already support creation times.

Hi all, I've created a custom lattice panel function for levelplot - instead of representing z by colour, it plot circles with radius proportional to z (in the style of the map plots of Jacques Bertin). I'm happy to email an example graph to anyone interested. The problem is now to create a key for the plot. This is difficult because all of the other lattice plots convey

I tracked down the source of the "invalid kernel image" in 1.73 -- it turns out that in two different places I was accessing word-sized variables as dwords :( Consequently, SYSLINUX would reject valid kernels. PXELINUX/ISOLINUX are unaffected. Thus, SYSLINUX 1.74 is out. Expect a 1.75-pre1 quite soon. I'm working on a rewrite using 32-bit code from the very beginning, which

On 2016-09-27 02:28, Philip Reames wrote: > On 09/20/2016 12:05 PM, Matti Niemenmaa via llvm-dev wrote: >> I posted some questions related to implementing inference of nsw/nuw >> flags based on known icmp results to Bug 30428 ( >> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30428 ) and it was recommended >> that I engage a wider audience by coming here. The minimal context is

Duncan, Yes, I'd been pretty much performing the same diagnosis in parallel - it seems we just don't have that libLLVMSupport library built. Last night, tried the build of clang a few different ways to get that library built - including specifying the --gcc-toolchain option. No Joy! Which of the clang/llvm source trees provides it? or is it in another source package? tools? Is there a

Morning... I have a package that I think wants to compile against the X11 source tree. http://openchrome.org - its a snapshot from there.... Anyway the command it tells me to run is: xmkmf /usr/src/xc make make install This is to build a updated X graphics driver... However when I do this I get errors as there is not /usr/src/xc (no surprise) I did then "up2date xorg-x11-sdk"

No concerns from me. I use Alive2 all the time, and it would be fantastic to have it available online reliably. If we can get Alive1 up there too, that would be even better. I still use that to try to prove things where it's not obvious how to express the relationships in pure LLVM IR: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/NDu On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:05 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

...ollections’ data, about 100 variables containing the results of a battery of standard tests. These are administered at intervals and so this is repeating data as well. The number of repetitions varies between cases, so in its one case per line format the data is non-rectangular. At present I have shoehorned all of this into SPSS, with each case on one line. My test database has 2,500 variables and 1,500 cases (or persons), and in SPSS’s *.SAV format is ~4MB. The one I finally work with will be larger again, though likely within one order of magnitude. Down the track, funding permitting, I hope to be w...

On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Matthew Hilt wrote: > The target in this case is 8-bit, accumulator based, however it is Von Neumann; so - good to know it's not *quite* the "Trifecta of Doom". LLVM offers some very attractive features for our usage, and it would be disappointing to abandon it as an option all together. Faced with the alternative being to write the compiler from

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:52:51PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:55:26 -0400 > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > > I've got a netbook, circe 2009. When I got it, not that I was wild about > > ubuntu, but there was specifically an ubuntu netbook remix. Well, it's a > > few years later - has anyone put CentOS (6, preferably) on a netbook, and >

Duncan, Many thanks for your comments. The core issue we're running into is this: $ GCC=/usr/bin/gcc LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config make Compiling utils/TargetInfo.cpp Linking TargetInfo ld: fatal: library -lLLVMSupport: not found ld: fatal: file processing errors. No output written to TargetInfo collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit statusAll other gyrations are attempts to shoehorn

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Quick answers, I'm on txgiving break this week and not doing any real > work, but I will be doing more compiler-rt work when I get back > (initially focused at getting profile libs to come from compiler-rt on > Linux et al). > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at

Debuginfo folks, What is your opinion on this proposal? Do we need to work on better DWARFLinker library for now? or Can we start to integrate llvm-dwarfutil as a series of small patches? If it is OK to start integrating of llvm-dwarfutil, Is it OK to move llvm-objcopy implementation into separate library ObjCopy ? Thank you, Alexey. On 01.09.2020 20:18, James Y Knight wrote: > > >

...ther disjoint sets, or nested >> sets? >> > > This is entirely possible, for example, all the andersens's will end up > directional. > All of context-sensitive will end up another way. > Is your suggestion that they then drop all this info because it can't be > shoehorned into the existing TBAA format? > And that someone else later disentangle this from the actual *type based > info* being produced by other frontends? > What if someone wants to produce both kinds of info? > Right now your description is essentially the output of an analysis that > can...

Hi All, I have a windows 7 as my domU and some windows based drivers are not fully functional (like: touchpad-driver etc ) because they are SMBus based. I was looking at a way to passthrough the SMBus at 00:1f.03 on south bridge ( 00:1f.0), I was debugging at pt-graphics.c and understand that it is detecting the south bridge and passing it through but the other functions for the same dev-id are