Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "shoconsume".
2014 Mar 11
0
Re: cgroup for VM - does it work properly?
...is still distributed equally - still ~30% for each.
>
> All processes are under itself default cgroup, so / for host dd and each
> VM in their own (something like /machine/<domain-name>). I didn't change
> any cgroup directly in this case.
> After that qemu processes should shoconsume significantly less cpu than
> others, isn't it (change "relative priority" from 1024 to 10)?
> Limiting by period or quota works, but I would be really happy to use
> just cpu.shares - I don't want to write own process scheduler, weights
> of cpu sharing is sufficient...
2014 Mar 05
5
cgroup for VM - does it work properly?
Hi
I tried to restrict usage of some running VM by cpu.shares (i.e. set to
10 from original 1024) on loaded system and it seem doesn't work as I
expected... all running processes has same CPU usage (by htop) :-/
Does anyone has same experience?
Fedora 19, libvirt-1.0.5.9-1.fc19.x86_64
Thanks a lot
Martin
--
Martin Pavlásek <mpavlase@redhat.com>
OpenStack QA Associate/Red Hat