search for: shivam

...dering how I could change the capacity of arr from 30 to any other integral value via a function-pass. I know that 'alloca' can be used for reserving space on stack; further, 'store' can be used for writing to memory. I was wondering how that would work for an array though? Thanks, Shivam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131204/a8a357ff/attachment.html>

..., insert it into the IR right before (or after) the old one, RAUW the value, then delete the old instruction. You should be able to find a variety of examples of this sort of thing in most of the IR level optimization passes. I’d look at InstCombine in particular. -Jim On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Shivam Bhagi <shivam.bhagi at outlook.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While looking over the IR generated by my source code, I came across the following: > > %arr = alloca [30 x i8], align 1 > > In the source code this particular line of code is represented by: > > int arr[30];...

...ge or open phabricator review for them? Also gnu ld has already autocompletion for bash shell but l am not merging ld and lld completion scripts to one file because lld lacks some options compare to ld and bash completion scripts only parse --help argument. Scripts are attached to the mail! Regards Shivam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190708/cbc4fbec/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: _ld.lld Type: application/octet-stream S...

...rd as to the date corresponding to the data. Hence I want to insert the filename as a column in the respective file to help me in identifying to what date each data row belongs to. Sorry for the long mail, but wanted to make myself clear. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Shivam [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted after 5PM Pacific time today. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200120/567b3b5a/attachment.html>

...have to make regular). Another approach that I could think of was to make a timebased sequence based on the date from the file and then use a loop to append one sequence after another. But am not having much success there either. Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and regards, Shivam structure(list("20110103", "20110104", "20110105", "20110106", "20110107", "20110110", "20110111", "20110112", "20110113", "20110114", "20110117", "20110118", "20110...

...ind, the object size increases to 1.35 GB. This was in contradiction to the earlier result. What am I missing? Why a 75% reduction in size in one case and double size in other? Anyone with any explanation? Sorry for the verbose email, just wanted to make my case clear. Thanks in advance, Regards Shivam [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ement: no such table: testeq) In addition: Warning message: In value[[3L]](cond) : RAW() can only be applied to a 'raw', not a 'double' Can anyone guide me if there is any difference in the structure of the two dataframes or what else can be the issue? Thanks in advance, Regards, Shivam Singh [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...6713994619)), .Names = c("DATE", "VOL"), row.names = c(NA, 6L), class = "data.frame") Please do let me know if any more information from my side would help or if I need to explain the issue more clearly. Any minor improvement will be great help. Thanks in advance. -Shivam -- *Victoria Concordia Crescit*

...ead, DATE == '2011-01-03') > nrow(dlftest) [1] 6 So the issue has to be the date-class columns in the dataframe, but what is the issue I have no idea. Can anyone help please? Thanks a lot for reading though this long email. Kindly reply if you have an idea about either issue. Regards, Shivam [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have the following instruction in my IR- %call2 = call i8* @strcpy(i8* %1, i8* %2) #2 I intend to change call to strcpy with strncpy. I have included the following code in runOnFunction, so that when it is strcpy's turn to be invoked, strncpy is invoked instead. Assuming I* is the strcpy instruction, CallInst* x=new

...opt 0x08ec5d4d llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 229 14 opt 0x08ec5f41 llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) + 39 15 opt 0x0849c28b main + 5835 16 libc.so.6 0xb750be46 __libc_start_main + 230 17 opt 0x0848e4b1 How can I fix it? Thanks, Shivam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131205/95e68986/attachment.html>

...;); BasicBlock::iterator ii(*I); ReplaceInstWithInst(I->getParent()->getInstList(), ii, pa); Why am I running into Value::replaceAllUsesWith(llvm::Value*): Assertion New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' ? Thanks, Shivam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131205/8cfb6933/attachment.html>

...in their paper. What my question is, is the intermediate step of calculating V1,V2.... etc necessary? Cant we simply calculate returns at a lag of 300 for the entire day and then divide it by 300 to achieve the same result. What am I missing here? Can anyone point out please. Thanks and regards, Shivam