search for: shitstorm

...using Debian 11 and the Samba package from Debian. > > Any ideas on what the problem is? The version of NTPsec that ships with Debian Bookworm has broken MS-SNTP support; no one here wants to help. I would suggest turning off the mssntp restrict in default before listening to the vitrololic shitstorm a couple of people here will unleash. Or you can follow the bleating; using chrony and crapping on NTPsec.

Hello All, I want to ask about CentOS and money. Please do not start some kind of shitstorm over this, it isn't productive. I have just been looking at archive.org to see when the paypal option went missing from the donate menu at centos.org. I can't pin it down, but it was there on October 16, 2010 and isn't now, so that's the information I have on that point. There...

Hello, My question is about how to join a "Linux" machine to a "Samba4 AD DC" domain. Given that I have a "Samba4 AD DC" running on a machine (A), given that I have a another machine (B) running "Linux Debian Wheezy", can you tell me: 1) How I can join (B) to the domain? Do I have to install specific packages on (B)? Does it look like something like

...ps with Debian Bookworm has broken > MS-SNTP support; no one here wants to help. I wouldn't say that, I tried to help, but couldn't, I am sure that someone else will be willing. > I would suggest turning > off the mssntp restrict in default before listening to the vitrololic > shitstorm a couple of people here will unleash. Whilst (it would seem) there was never a Linux ntp_signd client, NTP worked with Windows and Samba AD DCs, ntpsec will not. > > Or you can follow the bleating; using chrony and crapping on NTPsec. > Samba needs something between the clients and DC...

It appears that none of our windows clients are syncing their time with the samba DC.??? From what I can tell they are not able to get a response from the DC.? For example, where the DC is named athena: >w32tm /monitor /computers:athena athena[10.10.1.10:123] ? ICMP: 0ms delay ? NTP: error ERROR_TIMEOUT - no response from server in 1000ms From a Linux machine there is

control: reassign -1 xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64 On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 15:23 +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 03:08:26PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > According to that link, the fix seems to be configuration rather than > > code. > > Does this mean this bug against the kernel should be closed? > > Yes, the problem seems to be in the Xen