search for: shernet

Hello all. I hope this question is not too dumb, but I thought I'd ask it anyway since I'd like to get the opinion of the samba gurus out there. My question is this: -- is it better to run smbd and nmbd on a server that acts as a NFS server and has disks directly attached to it or is it better to run samba on a seperate machine that acts as a client to the NFS server? In other words, in

...nt options from smb.conf: [global] logon script = kix\logon.bat domain logons = yes password level = 16 security = user strict locking = yes [netlogon] comment=Netlogin path=/usr/local/samba/netlogon writable=no write list=pc,@shernet,@system create mask=0775 browsable=yes case sensitive = no Again, this problem happens intermtently, not all the time. And not from the same client or user. The same client may work fine for a few logon sessions, then all of a sudden it fails. Thanks in advance. -- Rob...

...mbd file: Invalid snum 17 for admin 1998/12/03 10:35:48 xxxxxx (xx.xx.xx.xx) couldn't find service admin This occurs when attempting to connect to a share from a Win95 system. This is the share definition from smb.conf: [admin] available = no browsable = no path=/usr/SHERNET.32/groups/admin read only = yes write list = pc fake oplocks = yes oplocks = no locking = no share modes = no There are quite a few other shares on the server that are configured exactly the same as this one, and those are accessible. Any would be h...

...mbd file: Invalid snum 17 for admin 1998/12/03 10:35:48 xxxxxx (xx.xx.xx.xx) couldn't find service admin This occurs when attempting to connect to a share from a Win95 system. This is the share definition from smb.conf: [admin] available = no browsable = no path=/usr/SHERNET.32/groups/admin read only = yes write list = pc fake oplocks = yes oplocks = no locking = no share modes = no There are quite a few other shares on the server that are configured exactly the same as this one, and those are accessible. Any would be h...