search for: shell_us

...5,8 @@ extern int whole_file; extern int write_batch; extern int read_batch; + extern int force_f_in; + extern int force_f_out; int rc; /* Don't clobber argv[] so that ps(1) can still show the right @@ -770,9 +772,14 @@ list_only = 1; } - pid = do_cmd(shell_cmd,shell_machine,shell_user,shell_path,&f_in,&f_out); + if (force_f_in != -1) { + ret = client_run(force_f_in, force_f_out, -1, argc, argv); + } + else { + pid = do_cmd(shell_cmd,shell_machine,shell_user,shell_path,&f_in,&f_out); - ret = client_run(f_in, f_out, pid, argc, argv); + ret = client_run(f...

...pointing to last ':' */ + run_inband = 1; } else if (p[1] == ':') { *p = 0; return start_socket_client(argv[argc-1], p+2, argc-1, argv); *************** *** 650,655 **** --- 660,675 ---- pid = do_cmd(shell_cmd,shell_machine,shell_user,shell_path,&f_in,&f_out); + /* if we're running in-band, we need to do the RSYNCD stuff first */ + if (run_inband) { + int tmpret; + tmpret = start_inband_exchange(shell_user, shell_path, + f_in, f_out, argc, argv); +...

> Just curious: what about the rsync+ patch? Thanks for the reminder. I've just committed Jos's rsync+ patch onto the "branch_mbp_rsyncplus_merge" branch. If it works OK and nobody screams I will move it across onto the main tree tomorrow or Wednesday. I see the patch doesn't add documentation about the new options to the man page, so we should fix that in the future.

People of cygwin & rsync, I recently attempted to get cygwin and rsync working to solve a backup/mirroring need in my computer life. Well, as you might guess, I ran into a little but of trouble. Strangely enough, rsync seemed to be regularly hanging when I attempted to do a "get" (sycronize a remote to a local dir). Well, considering I want to automate this, that was not going