Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "sheader".
Did you mean:
header
2010 Nov 02
1
Setting the names of a data.frame
I have tData as below. I need to set the names with the headers from the
first row in sHeaders
Sorry .. forgot how to set the names from row in another data frame .. pls
advise.
names(tData) = sHeaders[1,] does not work correctly
Also, why doesn't drop.levels(sHeaders) not work?
dput(tData)
structure(list(V1 = structure(c(3L, 1L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("P H Ravi
Kumar",
&quo...
2018 Dec 04
3
patch to support custom HTTP headers in download.file() and url()
...t, headers, cacheOK) : \
+ in_R_HTTPOpen(url, agent, headers, cacheOK));
#define Ri_HTTPRead(ctx, dest, len) \
(meth ? in_R_HTTPRead2(ctx, dest, len) : in_R_HTTPRead(ctx, dest, len))
@@ -115,19 +115,20 @@ static Rboolean url_open(Rconnection con)
#endif
case HTTPsh:
{
- SEXP sheaders, agentFun;
- const char *headers;
+ SEXP sagent, agentFun;
+ const char *agent;
SEXP s_makeUserAgent = install("makeUserAgent");
agentFun = PROTECT(lang1(s_makeUserAgent)); // defaults to ,TRUE
SEXP utilsNS = PROTECT(R_FindNamespace(mkString("utils")));
- sheaders = eval(...
2009 Jan 14
5
[PATCH] Support cross-bitness guest when core-dumping
This patch allows core-dumping to work on a cross-bit host/guest configuration, whereas previously that was not supported. It supports both PV and FV guests. The core file format generated by the host, needs to match that of the guest, so an alignment issue is addressed, along with the p2m frame list handling being done according to the guest size.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] Handling ELF groups.
So I was looking into handling ELF groups today in the Atom model. It
appears that we will need to add the concept of a group to the atom
model directly, as modeling it with references fails to capture some
semantics.
http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html
Groups in ELF are collections of sections that must be either included
or excluded as a unit. They also are used to implement COMDAT. Each
group has an "identifying symbol entry" or "group signature". This is
only used in the case of COMDAT groups (which are marked with a...
2012 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] Handling ELF groups.
...looking into handling ELF groups today in the Atom model. It
>> appears that we will need to add the concept of a group to the atom
>> model directly, as modeling it with references fails to capture some
>> semantics.
>>
>> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html
>>
>> Groups in ELF are collections of sections that must be either included
>> or excluded as a unit.
> I thought groups were a collection of symbol - not sections. Is this a case
> where there is one symbol per section?
It's sections. There is no restriction on...
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] Handling ELF groups.
...te:
> So I was looking into handling ELF groups today in the Atom model. It
> appears that we will need to add the concept of a group to the atom
> model directly, as modeling it with references fails to capture some
> semantics.
>
> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html
>
> Groups in ELF are collections of sections that must be either included
> or excluded as a unit.
I thought groups were a collection of symbol - not sections. Is this a case
where there is one symbol per section?
> They also are used to implement COMDAT. Each
> group has...
2020 Jul 25
2
Any LLD guarantees on section alignment across TUs?
Suppose i write
// foo.cpp
__attribute__((section(“foo”))) int x;
// bar.cpp
__attribute__((section(“foo”))) int y;
And i compile and link these two object files together using lld. What
assumptions can I make regarding alignment/padding between the two symbols?
I’m comfortable getting an answer by reading the source, but that won’t
tell if any properties i discover are guaranteed or just
2012 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] Handling ELF groups.
...ELF groups today in the Atom model. It
>>> appears that we will need to add the concept of a group to the atom
>>> model directly, as modeling it with references fails to capture some
>>> semantics.
>>>
>>> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html
>>>
>>> Groups in ELF are collections of sections that must be either included
>>> or excluded as a unit.
>> I thought groups were a collection of symbol - not sections. Is this a case
>> where there is one symbol per section?
>
> It's sectio...
2012 Dec 20
1
[LLVMdev] Handling ELF groups.
...Atom model. It
> >>> appears that we will need to add the concept of a group to the atom
> >>> model directly, as modeling it with references fails to capture some
> >>> semantics.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html
> >>>
> >>> Groups in ELF are collections of sections that must be either included
> >>> or excluded as a unit.
> >> I thought groups were a collection of symbol - not sections. Is this a
> case
> >> where there is one symbol per sectio...
2020 Jun 09
2
[Debuginfo][DWARF][LLD] Remove obsolete debug info in lld.
...iles will appear in
link-line order." -
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/816-1386/chapter6-94076/index.html
"When not otherwise constrained, sections should be emitted in input
order." - https://web.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/cs140-spring18/pintos/specs/sysv-abi-update.html/ch4.sheader.html
)
So that works a treat, exactly as Paul suggested.
Also works to modify the debug_ranges/rnglists section keeping list
fragments in the same comdat group too - though the object size
overhead there is probably higher than worthwhile, given the size of
the contributions versus the size of EL...
2020 Jun 04
4
[Debuginfo][DWARF][LLD] Remove obsolete debug info in lld.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:27 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:31 PM
> > To: Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
> > Cc: jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >