search for: shdrs

...gt; https://clbin.com/vvB8O > <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs > <tomhughes> don't think it's the problem but this file is quite odd - the > ro segment in the phdrs doesn't seem to have to any section listed in the > shdrs > <tomhughes> s/have/map/ > > Is this something where LLD can be reasonably changed to be compatible > with valgrind without this workaround? > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >...

...n bad and good headers: https://clbin.com/vvB8O <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs <tomhughes> don't think it's the problem but this file is quite odd - the ro segment in the phdrs doesn't seem to have to any section listed in the shdrs <tomhughes> s/have/map/ Is this something where LLD can be reasonably changed to be compatible with valgrind without this workaround? Thanks, Andrew On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: > As a frontend, what are the downsides of enabling...

...n.com/vvB8O >> <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs >> <tomhughes> don't think it's the problem but this file is quite odd - the >> ro segment in the phdrs doesn't seem to have to any section listed in the >> shdrs >> <tomhughes> s/have/map/ >> >> Is this something where LLD can be reasonably changed to be compatible >> with valgrind without this workaround? >> >> Thanks, >> Andrew >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at...

As a frontend, what are the downsides of enabling --no-rosegment by default? So far the pro list is: * valgrind debug info will work by default What's on the con list? On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> wrote: > It's more of a valgrind issue than an LLD issue, but you can work around > it by linking with --no-rosegment > > > >