search for: shasum

...3.0.19](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v3.0.18...v3.0.19) * [Changes in 2.3.15](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v2.3.14...v2.3.15) Thanks to the people who responsibly reported these security issues. Here are the SHA-1 checksums for each gem: ### 3.2.11 ``` [aaron@higgins dist]$ shasum *3.2.11* 933cd2821b30cdff4a2e0b5cc63f4d2c6b29affe actionmailer-3.2.11.gem 54731c51b55bf0215392971b982139775c0bfa2b actionpack-3.2.11.gem 5ccde66568d8051405c01063f1afaed13bd01082 activemodel-3.2.11.gem f360c17968486479b0a4207e7eccbe379186a9d2 activerecord-3.2.11.gem c61ff513be8a8aef898d2e5c4c950...

...3.0.19](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v3.0.18...v3.0.19) * [Changes in 2.3.15](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v2.3.14...v2.3.15) Thanks to the people who responsibly reported these security issues. Here are the SHA-1 checksums for each gem: ### 3.2.11 ``` [aaron@higgins dist]$ shasum *3.2.11* 933cd2821b30cdff4a2e0b5cc63f4d2c6b29affe actionmailer-3.2.11.gem 54731c51b55bf0215392971b982139775c0bfa2b actionpack-3.2.11.gem 5ccde66568d8051405c01063f1afaed13bd01082 activemodel-3.2.11.gem f360c17968486479b0a4207e7eccbe379186a9d2 activerecord-3.2.11.gem c61ff513be8a8aef898d2e5c4c950...

Dear All, The release tarball was just reverted to old (original) state. This is what I have locally: $ shasum llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz 42d139ab4c9f0c539c60f5ac07486e9d30fc1280 llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz Please let me know asap, if something is still broken. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: > Dear All, > > The release tarball was just reverted to old (original) state. > > This is what I have locally: > > $ shasum llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz > 42d139ab4c9f0c539c60f5ac07486e9d30fc1280 llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz > > Please let me know asap, if something is still broken. I'm confused. Does the release tarball now match RELEASE_32/final or not? If not, that's a problem for those of us who count on the repo...

...INSTALL c732c6ec885f4085ba20ae837ac9bcf2ad0952e61fcf910953bdd8dd2c103d23 NEWS 4e21b62f515b749f80997063fceab626d7258c7d650e81a662ba8e0640f12f62 NEWS.0 12b30c724117b1b2b11484673906a6dcd48a361f69fc420b36194f9218692d01 NEWS.1 a10f84be31f897456a31d31690df2fdc3f21a197f28b4d04332cc85005dcd0d2 NEWS.2 shasum: R-2: shasum: R-3: Is a directory 02b1135d15ea969a3582caeb95594a05e830a6debcdb5b85ed2d5836a6a3fc78 R-latest.tar.gz 2fdd3e90f23f32692d4b3a0c0452f2c219a10882033d1774f8cadf25886c3ddc README 408737572ecc6e1135fdb2cf7a9dbb1a6cb27967c757f1771b8c39d1fd2f1ab9 RESOURCES 52f934a4e8581945cbc1ba23493274906...

...GELOG.md) *Full listing* To see the full list of changes, [check out all the commits on GitHub](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v3.2.14...v3.2.15). ## SHA-1 If you''d like to verify that your gem is the same as the one I''ve uploaded, please use these SHA-1 hashes: ``` $ shasum * 3c9bf15a9b2ea5c4c3280638776f84783adefe6d actionmailer-3.2.15.gem 34cc3d5cbcee97a4e57ee9d909f51f0f387991bb actionpack-3.2.15.gem b1c631dd75fffee2f34407aaf01405aef6c63a43 activemodel-3.2.15.gem 7c86074b47c3864943b719d5b969264e2ace722c activerecord-3.2.15.gem a95f88e30d1af9c377f01725282d0e581bd9...

...GELOG.md) *Full listing* To see the full list of changes, [check out all the commits on GitHub](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v3.2.14...v3.2.15). ## SHA-1 If you''d like to verify that your gem is the same as the one I''ve uploaded, please use these SHA-1 hashes: ``` $ shasum * 3c9bf15a9b2ea5c4c3280638776f84783adefe6d actionmailer-3.2.15.gem 34cc3d5cbcee97a4e57ee9d909f51f0f387991bb actionpack-3.2.15.gem b1c631dd75fffee2f34407aaf01405aef6c63a43 activemodel-3.2.15.gem 7c86074b47c3864943b719d5b969264e2ace722c activerecord-3.2.15.gem a95f88e30d1af9c377f01725282d0e581bd9...

I’m happy to run them, although I’d appreciate a pointer to the appropriate documentation. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM To: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

...stall-1511.iso. I installed netinstall without a problem. > Its sha256sum is > 9ed9ffb5d89ab8cca834afce354daa70a21dcb410f58287d6316259ff89758f5, which > matches sha256sum.txt. Well, I prefer md5sums, so pretty much the same. Moreover, k3b, the app I use to burn CDs talks md5sums, not shasums. > I booted from the ISO, selected "installation source" and entered > "mirror.sfo12.us.leaseweb.net/centos/7/isos/x86_64/" in the field to the > right of the "http://" prefix. Yeah, I did all that exactly the same. It's pretty idiot-proof for just a...

On 12/15/2015 04:28 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2015 12:29 PM, ken wrote: >> But that configuration page probes, then it says, "Error setting up >> base repository". > > I'm not sure why that wouldn't work. I'm pretty sure you need to use a > repository whose version matches the ISO, but that should be the case > unless you got the

Good day, I initially posted this issue on CentOS-mirror a week ago but did not receive any response. I'm looking for a resolution to a small issue with the cloud image repository for the latest CentOS-7 image. As far as I understand, the latest release of the CentOS-7 image should always be posted to http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_ 64-GenericCloud.qcow2 The checksum

...he key has been signed by trustworthy other keys. See the end of this mail for information on the signing keys. * If you are not able to use an existing version of GnuPG, you have to verify the SHA-1 checksum. On Unix systems the command to do this is either "sha1sum" or "shasum". Assuming you downloaded the file gnupg-2.4.5.tar.bz2, you run the command like this: sha1sum gnupg-2.4.5.tar.bz2 and check that the output matches the next line: ae0935ead29a2dfa34d6b48d70808652bc3ca73b gnupg-2.4.5.tar.bz2 7c5fa919c2eb90194e844de027a36e87c7be8a80 gpg4win-4.3...

...he key has been signed by trustworthy other keys. See the end of this mail for information on the signing keys. * If you are not able to use an existing version of GnuPG, you have to verify the SHA-1 checksum. On Unix systems the command to do this is either "sha1sum" or "shasum". Assuming you downloaded the file gnupg-2.5.1.tar.bz2, you run the command like this: sha1sum gnupg-2.5.1.tar.bz2 and check that the output matches the next line: 1336f00a6d9ff9806a2187bb06e8faf59391b5a2 gnupg-2.5.1.tar.bz2 4237371dbe5ebafaa015da2f3681f466b65c9742 gnupg-w32-2...

I'm trying to manually garbage data on bricks (when the volume is stopped) and then check whether healing is possible. For example: Start: # glusterd --debug Bricks (on EXT4 mounted with 'rw,realtime'): # mkdir /root/data0 # mkdir /root/data1 # mkdir /root/data2 Volume: # gluster volume create gv0 replica 3 [local-ip]:/root/data0 [local-ip]:/root/data1 [local-ip]:/root/data2

...he key has been signed by trustworthy other keys. See the end of this mail for information on the signing keys. * If you are not able to use an existing version of GnuPG, you have to verify the SHA-1 checksum. On Unix systems the command to do this is either "sha1sum" or "shasum". Assuming you downloaded the file gnupg-2.5.0.tar.bz2, you run the command like this: sha1sum gnupg-2.5.0.tar.bz2 and check that the output matches the next line: eb33777782b1d5c766f449a26126ab1d9cef25ef gnupg-2.5.0.tar.bz2 bc4ff3b8b1b850eb18068f116d9d134583fdd92e gnupg-w32-2...

...he key has been signed by trustworthy other keys. See the end of this mail for information on the signing keys. * If you are not able to use an existing version of GnuPG, you have to verify the SHA-1 checksum. On Unix systems the command to do this is either "sha1sum" or "shasum". Assuming you downloaded the file gnupg-2.4.4.tar.bz2, you run the command like this: sha1sum gnupg-2.4.4.tar.bz2 and check that the output matches the next line: 228b3984325fdeebc5e3f2d165c6419a5ebc28de gnupg-2.4.4.tar.bz2 1be67fe7a98c313d3767554cd48517735d20b7b9 gnupg-w32-2...