Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sharky4".
2020 Mar 17
3
Running amanda on CentOS 7: "amanda-udp.service failed."
I am trying to get amanda backup going on a CentOS 7 system and things are not
working:
sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo systemctl start amanda-udp
[sudo] password for heller:
Job for amanda-udp.service failed because a configured resource limit was exceeded. See "systemctl status amanda-udp.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo systemctl status...
2020 Mar 17
0
Running amanda on CentOS 7: "amanda-udp.service failed."
...amidxtaped to allow recovery clients to access the tape device.
??? server_args??? ? = -auth=bsd amdump
??? flags??? ??? ??? = IPv4
}
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/17/20 7:03 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> I am trying to get amanda backup going on a CentOS 7 system and things are not
> working:
>
> sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo systemctl start amanda-udp
> [sudo] password for heller:
> Job for amanda-udp.service failed because a configured resource limit was exceeded. See "systemctl status amanda-udp.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
> sharky4.deepsoft.com% sudo sys...
2020 Aug 02
0
8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
...ll distros that do shim.
> Microsoft is the official CA for secureboot.
>
> So in the next few hours, after the mirrors sync up .. you should be
> able to fix any EL7 machines.
Question: is this only a problem for bare metal w/EFI or are VMs affected? I
have a VPS running CentOS 7:
sharky4.deepsoft.com% uname -a
Linux sharky4.deepsoft.com 3.10.0-1127.13.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 23
15:46:38 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sharky4.deepsoft.com% rpm -qa grub\* shim\*
grub2-tools-extra-2.02-0.81.el7.centos.x86_64
grub2-pc-modules-2.02-0.81.el7.centos.noarch
grub2-tools-minima...
2020 Aug 02
5
8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable
On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto:
>> On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote:
>>> At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>>>> Hi Johnny,
>>>> thank you very much for clarification.
>>>>
>>>> You said that in the centos infrastructure only one server got the
>>>>