search for: sharetab

There was a log of talk about ZFS and NFS shares being a problem when there was a large number of filesystems. There was a fix that in part included an in kernel sharetab (I think :) Does anyone know if this has made it into S10u4? Thanks, BlueUmp This message posted from opensolaris.org

OK, I know that there''s been some discussion on this before, but I''m not sure that any specific advice came out of it. What would the advice be for supporting a largish number of users (10,000 say) on a system that supports ZFS? We currently use vxfs and assign a user quota, and backups are done via Legato Networker. >From what little I currently understand, the general

-bash-3.2$ zfs share tank cannot share ''tank'': share(1M) failed -bash-3.2$ how do i figure out what''s wrong? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Saw this while writing a script today -- while debugging the script, I was ctrl-c-ing it a lot rather than wait for the zfs create / zfs set commands to complete. After doing so, my cleanup script failed to zfs destroy the new filesystem: root at kronos:/ # zfs destroy -f raid/www/user-testuser cannot unshare ''raid/www/user-testuser'': /raid/www/user-testuser: not shared root

Hi ZFS gods, I have a x4500 I wish to upgrade from a SVM UFS Sol 10u5 to a ZFS rpool 10u6 or Opensolaris. Since I know (via backing up my sharetab) what shares I need to have (all nfs share - no cifs on this 4500 - YAY) and have organised downtime for this server, would it be easier for me to go to Solaris 10u6 (or opensolaris) by just installing from scratch and re-importing the ZPOOL (of course after exporting it before installing t...

I have one thing happening now at boot which must have happened during the migration to zfs boot. I get an error message about /dev/random: "No randomness provider enabled for /dev/random. Use cryptoadm to provide one." Does anyone know how to fix this? Another thing: Is it possible to upgrade to a higher build when using zfs boot? Is this what LiveUpgrade does? And is there a step by

...ult tank aclmode groupmask default tank aclinherit secure default tank canmount on default tank shareiscsi off default tank xattr on default /etc/dfs/dfstab is empty /etc/dfs/sharetab: /tank - nfs rw Now, when I try to mount this share from multiple boxes, I get ''Permission denied'' when I try to create/modify any file. Mounting from a Linux box: /etc/fstab mosasaur:/tank /tank nfs4 rw,user 0 0 mount /tank ls -al tank == drwxr...

...ult tank aclmode groupmask default tank aclinherit secure default tank canmount on default tank shareiscsi off default tank xattr on default /etc/dfs/dfstab is empty /etc/dfs/sharetab: /tank - nfs rw Now, when I try to mount this share from multiple boxes, I get ''Permission denied'' when I try to create/modify any file. Mounting from a Linux box: /etc/fstab mosasaur:/tank /tank nfs4 rw,user 0 0 mount /tank ls -al tank == drwxr...

Hi, After upgrading to b95 of OSOL/Indiana, and doing a ZFS upgrade to the newer revision, all arrays I have using ZFS mirroring are displaying errors. This started happening immediately after ZFS upgrades. Here is an example: ormandj at neutron.corenode.com:~$ zpool status pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was

...= 3 6074: fstat64(3, 0x08047AD0) = 0 6074: stat64("/dev/pts/0", 0x08047BE0) = 0 6074: open("/etc/mnttab", O_RDONLY) = 4 6074: fstat64(4, 0x08047AA0) = 0 6074: open("/etc/dfs/sharetab", O_RDONLY) = 5 6074: fstat64(5, 0x08047AA0) = 0 6074: open("/etc/mnttab", O_RDONLY) = 6 6074: fstat64(6, 0x08047AB0) = 0 6074: sysconfig(_CONFIG_PAGESIZE) = 4096 6074: ioctl...

...0K 0K 0K 0% /proc mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab swap 2.2G 1.1M 2.2G 1% /etc/svc/volatile objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab /usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1 8.9G 5.9G 2.9G 67% /lib/libc.so.1 fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd swap 2.2G 40K 2.2G 1% /tmp swap 2.2G 40K 2.2G 1% /var/run /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7...

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=971 Summary: zfs key -l fails after unloading (keyscope=dataset) Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo:

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance

...00000000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0xFEC30000 memcntl(0xFE620000, 3576, MC_ADVISE, MADV_WILLNEED, 0, 0) = 0 open("/dev/zfs", O_RDWR) = 3 open("/etc/mnttab", O_RDONLY) = 4 open("/etc/dfs/sharetab", O_RDONLY) = 5 stat64("/lib/libavl.so.1", 0x080431A8) = 0 resolvepath("/lib/libavl.so.1", "/lib/libavl.so.1", 1023) = 16 open("/lib/libavl.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 6 mmapobj(6, MMOBJ_INTERPRET, 0xFEC305E0, 0x08043214, 0x0...

We are looking for a replacement enterprise file system to handle storage needs for our campus. For the past 10 years, we have been happily using DFS (the distributed file system component of DCE), but unfortunately IBM killed off that product and we have been running without support for over a year now. We have looked at a variety of possible options, none of which have proven fruitful. We are