search for: sharers

Hi all, I've used most of this weekend finalizing my migration from an old server running Dovecot 2.2.22 to a brand new installation running 2.3.8. In general, the migration was painless, everything just clicked, but checking up on the finer details post migration i've found out that user shared folders does not seem to work anymore, and I simply can't get it to work. The setups

On 9.12.2019 10.51, Peter Reinhold wrote: > On 2019-12-09 09:42, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >>> That I can, here (anonymized where relevant) >>> >> >> Config looks fine. Have you tried >> >> 'A1 SELECT Shared/user at sharer.dk'? > > Yields this, which is the same I got when trying to debug using > doveadm acl, it seems like the shared

On 2019-12-09 09:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> Yields this, which is the same I got when trying to debug using >> doveadm acl, it seems like the shared mailboxes aren't placed in the >> shared namespace at all. >> >> ? A1 SELECT Shared/user at sharer.dk >> ? A1 NO Mailbox doesn't exist: Shared/user at sharer.dk (0.006 + 0.000 + >> 0.005

On 2019-12-09 14:10, Peter Reinhold via dovecot wrote: > auth-master: userdb lookup(user at sharer.dk): Started userdb lookup > auth-master: conn unix:/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb: Connecting > auth-master: conn unix:/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=1636,uid=0): > Client connected (fd=9) > auth-master: userdb lookup(user at sharer.dk): auth USER input: > user at sharer.dk uid=?

On 8.12.2019 13.13, Peter Reinhold via dovecot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've used most of this weekend finalizing my migration from an old > server running Dovecot 2.2.22 to a brand new installation running 2.3.8. > > In general, the migration was painless, everything just clicked, but > checking up on the finer details post migration i've found out that > user shared

Dear All, This is Parag here. I have configured SAMBA on Solaros 8/9. After creating proper sharer on smb.conf file , my windows client [ Win2k ] are in a position to use the sharer/shared folder lying on solaris.SAMBA is working fine. We would like to achive ACL [ Access Control List ] on same. Basically we have different windows users who are the part of various domain. Now we wanted the

On 2019-12-09 09:42, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> That I can, here (anonymized where relevant) >> > > Config looks fine. Have you tried > > 'A1 SELECT Shared/user at sharer.dk'? Yields this, which is the same I got when trying to debug using doveadm acl, it seems like the shared mailboxes aren't placed in the shared namespace at all. A1 SELECT Shared/user at

Here's one for you if you have the time: I very stupidly killed the wrong process on a server on a remote site on Friday and now I cannot ssh login to it! It's not a major problem as it's main functions are as a file and print sharer (samba) and to run postfix/mailscanner, and I can have someone on site reboot the server when they start work on Monday, but I was wondering whether I

Is it possible (and if so, how) within Samba to restrict printers to be using by only certain users/groups? We have a printer dedicated to printing our checks that was using one of those '4 PCs -> 1 printer' devices. We've been constantly having problems with transmissions getting garbled when using the printer sharer (everything's fine if a PC is directly connected), and

...ration]. The problem we are experiencing is that the standard daemon processes [SMBD] are using significantly more CPU [processes that were running a 10% are now running at over 40%]. Has anybody seen or heard of this before or is this a FC4 specific problem. The boxes are primarily Windows file sharers but they do run qmail as well. Any help would be greatly appreciated Regards Brad Horrocks -- Secure Office Services ABN 75 196 364 531 19 Burrendong Road COOMBABAH QLD 4216 Ph. +61 7 5537 4955 Fx. +61 7 5537 4966 web: http://www.secureoffice.com.au

WorkShop Virtualiza??o com Proxmox VE ------------------------------ <https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?s=100&p[url]=http://blog.konnectati.com.br/arquivos/1276> Dia 12 de Julho, S?bado, a partir das 08hs00 acontecer? o WorkShop Virtualiza??o com Proxmox VE. Venha conhecer uma das melhores ferramentas de Virtualiza??o do Mercado. Com este treinamento, sua equipe de TI ter?

2015-01-23 4:20 GMT-03:00 Marc St?rmer <mail at marc-stuermer.de>: > > Zitat von Norberto Bensa <nbensa+dovecot at gmail.com>: > > Does anyone use cyrus2dovecot for migrations? If so, how do you deal with >> seen status when it is stored in the .index files? >> > > Why don't you use the migration tool that comes with Dovecot bundled > instead,

...hose that are able to find it. The rationality for this ruling is closely related to radio waves, satellite and tv signals. If it can not be restricted by physical means, there is no point trying to enforce it's capital loss. The closest the RIAA, for example, has come to busting canadian file sharers, netRadio djs and the like, is by going through the canuck version of the FCC. But since our version of the FCC is candian and not american, they have an immense task of getting anything into court. hernt. Nutty hey?

The first thing to do on Wednesday October 20 is to get in on EQTD. It will RISE up next days. There will be at least 100% from the beginning, so do it quick. After the yesterday's promotion the share price raised on 116% and was 0.013. Those lucky devils who bought stocks at the price of 0.006 yesterday have already earned 100% of their investment. And they will make more. Did you think

The first thing to do on Wednesday October 20 is to get in on EQTD. It will RISE up next days. There will be at least 100% from the beginning, so do it quick. After the yesterday's promotion the share price raised on 116% and was 0.013. Those lucky devils who bought stocks at the price of 0.006 yesterday have already earned 100% of their investment. And they will make more. Did you think

Hi at all . I have a big problem . I'he upgrade my Server from ( Linux 2.0.36 and Samba 1.19 ) to Linux 2.2.7 and Samba 2.0.3 ( redhat 6.0 ). I have used the same smb.conf but the systen do not work the same . I have a linux directory shared by 10 users with M$ Office 97 . With Old System ( Samba 1.19) when i open a file from one client if i try to open from an other i have a Exxcel

I had been comparing IE and Firefox Ajax performance, and since I have a couple of Unix boxes in my workshop, I threw Konqueror into the mix, and reported here earlier today (or yesterday) that Konqueror ( 3.4.3) could handle Ajax perfectly, at least as far as the simplest AWDWR Ajax example (./example/index) was concerned. It occurred to me to do a more grueling test. I took the

I''ve got something like this: # post_observer.rb after_create # ...stuff Delayed::Job.enqueue(PostSharer.new(post, post.user)) end ... # post_sharer.rb class PostSharer < Struct.new(:post, user) def perform # Delayed::Job calls .perform on the object passed into enqueue end end # post_controller_spec.rb it "shares the post" do

I got icecast up and running over the weekend. Now i have a couple of questions: 1. What can I do so that the record companies do not come after me ? IS it ok to stream mp3 music ? 2. I did some test. Some of my friends players would only play a few seconds and they had to select play to get more data. They were on a slow link. 3. Any other advice you may have. The play is to stream some

hello all i'm currently using passdb to enable and disable various namespaces conditionally : for example the following work namespace/inbox/inbox=no namespace/legacy_pfso/disabled=no namespace/legacy_pfso/inbox=no namespace/local_storage/disabled=no namespace/comboINBOX_local_pfso/disabled=no namespace/comboINBOX_local_pfso/inbox=yes but i can't get things like the following to work