search for: sharemodes

...rting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be used if the GPFS file system is exclusively exported by Samba. Access by local unix application or NFS exports could lead to corrupted files. The problem is that when I double click on anything (testing on txt files opening notepad) I get such message on...

...schema_mode = rfc2307 include = /etc/samba/loglevel.%m writeable = yes msdfs root = yes [homes] comment = Staff Home Directories path = /users/%u valid users = %S create mask = 0750 vfs objects = gpfs fileid fileid:mapping = fsname gpfs:sharemodes = No # nfs4: mode = special # nfs4: chown = yes # nfs4: acedup = merge [support] read only = no comment = Support area path = /<snip>/support valid users = <snip> <snip> <snip> <snip> <snip> create mode = 0664 vfs objects =...

Hi again, regarding my post "plenty of vacuuuming process" a "gluster volume heal" seems to improve the situation. But I still have a strange problem: Sometimes a user don't have permissions to? a restricted folder when h connects to a share or logs in at a windows client. In some times all permissions are granted. If the user creates a file, the user and group is

...<group list> hide files = /~$*/_*/:*/.*/.AppleDB/.AppleDouble/.bin/.AppleDesktop/Network Trash Folder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/TheFindByContentFolder/Temporary Items/desktop.ini/ vfs objects = gpfs gpfs:winattrs = yes gpfs:sharemodes = no Best, Alex <http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ> -- Mit besten Gr??en / Best Regards Alexander F?disch Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology - IT Department - Deutscher Platz 6 D-04103 Leipzig Phone: +49 (0)341 3550-154 Fax: +49 (0)34...

...t; Datum: 04.06.2015 08:47 Betreff: Re: [Samba] STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION when Read while Write on GPFS + CTDB Hello! We indeed need debug level 10 logs of smbd. But I bet that you're running into an incompatibility between SMB and GPFS share modes. Those don't match 100%, so turning off gpfs:sharemodes might be worth a try. Of course, this means that you lose interop share modes. I'd be happy to analyze this further and assist you in making a proper GPFS query out of this if needed. With best regards, Volker Lendecke On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Gast wrote: > Hi,...

Hai, Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-) And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date. So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Benedikt Kale? via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.5 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.5 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15590: libldb: performance issue with indexes (ldb 2.9.2 is already ???? released). o? Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15624: DH reconnect error

Hai, First i must say, i dont use/know gluster. But I noticed you config (smb.conf) is a bit off. store dos attributes = Yes << is missing. And i would say setup netbios name and REALM in CAPS. And > ??? smbd:search ask sharemode = no Should be : smbd search ask sharemod >> https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.10.0.html See smb.conf changes, What i dont

You should have looked before upgrading. ... If its an AD-DC. The change to samba AD DC with systemd is: systemctl stop smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl disable smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl mask smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl unmask samba-ad-dc systemctl enable samba-ad-dc systemctl start samba-ad-dc You should not start nmbd smbd winbind for the AD-DC, the

...local UNIX processes and NFS operations by preventing access corresponding to the SMB share modes. This requires a file system specific VFS module with proper support. This parameter defaults to no. Setting it to yes requires a file system module that supports file system sharemodes, otherwise attempts to access files will fail with a sharing violation. So there are a few questions in there. First of all, am I reading it right, the result is that local processes can't modify the locked files? To be fair, I have never seen this happen, to the point when I don't t...

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...

...Here is my seetings : mmlsfs sb -D nfs4 File locking semantics in effect -k all ACL semantics in effect /etc/samba/smb.conf : --------------------- clustering = yes fileid:mapping = fsname vfs objects = shadow_copy2 syncops gpfs fileid shadow:snapdir = .snapshots shadow:fixinodes =yes gpfs:sharemodes = Yes gpfs:leases = Yes posix locking = Yes kernel oplocks = Yes level2 oplocks = no force unknown acl user = Yes nfs4: mode = special nfs4: chown = yes nfs4: acedup = merge [share] read only = No browseable = yes path = /sb/share map acl inherit = yes inherit acls = no dos filemode = no create ma...

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.10. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.10 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.10. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.10 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...

...) and SMB_COM_DELETE (SMB1 command number 0x6) have been removed. This only affects clients using MS-DOS based versions of SMB1, the last release of which was Windows 98. Users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for sharemodes ==================================================== smbd mapped sharemodes to Linux mandatory locks. This code in the Linux kernel was broken for a long time, and is planned to be removed with Linux 5.15. This Samba release removes the usage of mandatory locks for sharemodes and the "kerne...