Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sharedhold".
Did you mean:
sharedholder
2014 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] exc_bad_instruction on arm
..."236.3",
> "-v",
> "-coverage-file",
> [llFile UTF8String],
> //"/private/var/mobile/Applications/175ECA7F-3175-4AC9-971C-85272F5492C4/tmp/hw.ll"
> "-resource-dir",
> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],
> "-stdlib=libc++",
> "-fdeprecated-macro",
> "-fdebug-compilation-dir",
> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],
> "-ferror-limit",
> "...
2014 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] exc_bad_instruction on arm
Both Clang/LLVM 3.4 -> Clang/LLVM 3.5
And i will also try using MCJIT.
2014-09-17 18:56 GMT+06:00 Anton Smirnov <dev at antonsmirnov.name>:
> Hi, Tim.
>
> I've used Clang 3.4 final release and now i'm going to test it with 3.5
> release (since i've read about arm64 improvements).
> I will report my results.
>
> BTW, is it possible to get smth like
2014 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] exc_bad_instruction on arm
...v",
>>> "-coverage-file",
>>> [llFile UTF8String],
>>> //"/private/var/mobile/Applications/175ECA7F-3175-4AC9-971C-85272F5492C4/tmp/hw.ll"
>>> "-resource-dir",
>>> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],
>>> "-stdlib=libc++",
>>> "-fdeprecated-macro",
>>> "-fdebug-compilation-dir",
>>> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],
>>> "-fer...
2014 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] exc_bad_instruction on arm
...uot;-coverage-file",
>>>>> [llFile UTF8String],
>>>>> //"/private/var/mobile/Applications/175ECA7F-3175-4AC9-971C-85272F5492C4/tmp/hw.ll"
>>>>> "-resource-dir",
>>>>> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],
>>>>> "-stdlib=libc++",
>>>>> "-fdeprecated-macro",
>>>>> "-fdebug-compilation-dir",
>>>>> [[[ASPathHolder sharedHolder] tempFolder] UTF8String],...
2005 May 23
0
Re: Hi, Bryan; was: Re: pronunciation? <snip> --
...dora Project, and Fedora Core itself.
I have some increasing concerns though, but they aren't because Red Hat
is "greedy," "listening to its stockholders," etc...
Hell, there is a reason why Red Hat allowed major GPL projects to buy
stock before the IPO -- because it wanted sharedholders who understand
their GPL-centric model.
> At the same time, I find it offensive when people starting saying 'Dead
> Rat' just because the RHL line was pulled and they forget all the work
> that Redhat puts into the Linux kernel, gcc, glibc and a host of others
> that are at...