search for: shared_pointer

...was on the verge of tossing it overboard. I can't blame Chris for his reticence to add such nonsense to LLVM, as it only serves to slow builds and source control operations for all. That said, there are some parts of boost which are well-structured with few or minimal dependencies—like shared_pointer. I feel there's not a lot of need to rewrite these headers. Then again, there's not a lot of need to pull them in either, being as how such templates are trivial. — Gordon

Hi Chris, Thanks a lot for a detailed opinion and explanation! It really answers the original question, without going to far into political discussions about boost and generic allocators pros/cons aspects. ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ---- > Von: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > An: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Gesendet: Sonntag, den 18. Mai