search for: shared_and_public_arch

...a, what is it (google isn't particularly helpful)? > Second, local repository is fine, but what if two persons ever decide to work > on the same branch? I believe that arch allows you to do this kind of thing: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/tutorial/shared-and-public-archives.html#Shared_and_Public_Archives ... but again, I haven't really spent the time to look into revision control systems in any detail. -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Chris Lattner wrote: > The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize > that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to > seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version > control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've > heard rumars that there are now several good

...ch will become a problem. > > Second, local repository is fine, but what if two persons ever decide to > > work on the same branch? > > I believe that arch allows you to do this kind of thing: > http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/tutorial/shared-and-public-archives.ht >ml#Shared_and_Public_Archives Right, but you'd need HTTP/FTP server. Not a problem for *me*, but lots of folks are behind firewalls and can't do that. > ... but again, I haven't really spent the time to look into revision > control systems in any detail. Ok. - Volodya

...; > > Second, local repository is fine, but what if two persons ever decide to > > > work on the same branch? > > > > I believe that arch allows you to do this kind of thing: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/tutorial/shared-and-public-archives.ht > >ml#Shared_and_Public_Archives > > Right, but you'd need HTTP/FTP server. Not a problem for *me*, but lots of > folks are behind firewalls and can't do that. Sure. I can't imagine that there is a wonderful solution other than this though. In particular, how can you do distributed development without i...