search for: share_name

...ve a Samba AD running Samba 4.7.5. Everything was working fine, when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have permission to access \\server-name\share_name" If I use smbclient, it allows me to login on the share, but if I do 'ls', I get: smb: \> ls NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* I have tried the following: 1. The Domain admin can still access the shares - both fro...

...hing was working fine, >> when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied >> access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 >> machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: >> >> "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have >> permission to access \\server-name\share_name" >> >> If I use smbclient, it allows me to login on the share, but if I do >> 'ls', I get: >> >> smb: \> ls >> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* >> >> I have trie...

...the Windows network as other Microsoft Windows computers correctly do. I have not been able to see the Samba server in the network list even though the network discovery was allowed on Windows workstations and their firewall was disabled temporarily. To access the shares on Samba with \\server_name\share_name, or \\samba_server_ip_address\share_name, or through mapped network drives is working perfectly, however. Here are details I suppose you should know to be able to consider what might be wrong: 1.. OS of the box with Samba ? Ubuntu Server 14.04.1 LTS 64-bit 2.. Samba version ? 4.1.11 3.. Sam...

i am running freebsd 4.6.2 i am using this command to mount a windows share from windows xp mount_smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and everytime i get this message mount_smbfs: can't get server address: ssyerr = operation timed out i have also tried this command mount -t smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and get the same message can any one give me some ideas to try thanks alot Ben

Hi all, I need to mount a Windows share locally on my laptop. However, I cannot do this via sudo mount -t smbfs //host_name/share_name /local_mount because the host_name has two IP addresses with it as shown by nmblookup //host_name. (That is, I try mounting and I'm given this error: mount error(115): Operation now in progress Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) ) One IP address is a static one whi...

...amba 4.7.5. Everything was working fine, > when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied > access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 > machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: > > "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have > permission to access \\server-name\share_name" > > If I use smbclient, it allows me to login on the share, but if I do > 'ls', I get: > > smb: \> ls > NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* > > I have tried the following: > > 1....

...t; >> when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied > >> access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 > >> machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: > >> > >> "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have > >> permission to access \\server-name\share_name" > >> > >> If I use smbclient, it allows me to login on the share, but if I do > >> 'ls', I get: > >> > >> smb: \> ls > >> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listi...

HI all :-) Using debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4 ) often I mount ntfs partition (using mount.ntfs-3g) of a usb external disk. So I can access from my lan to this usb disk. [usb0] path=/media/usb0 writable = yes browseable = no valid users = nick [...] when I finish to use this disk and I try to umount it samba doesn't release this the disk: umount /media/usb0 (or umount

...when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied >>>> access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 >>>> machine, logged in as a user in "Domain Uses", I get: >>>> >>>> "Windows cannot access \\server-name\share_name. You do not have >>>> permission to access \\server-name\share_name" >>>> >>>> If I use smbclient, it allows me to login on the share, but if I do >>>> 'ls', I get: >>>> >>>> smb: \> ls >>>> NT_STATU...

...= 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY logon path = logon home = domain logons = Yes os level = 128 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes remote browse sync = yes [<share_name>] comment = <share_name> path = /<share_path>/<share_name> force group = domadm read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 guest ok = Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can...

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:13:35 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If you mean, Linux <=> Linux , use automounting, of dedicated mounts. > Cifs/nfs, depending on you setup and what you need. > > The problem is, they don't seem to work any more. They all seem to rely on mount.cifs and you need to be root to run this. When

Hello, I have a little question that I am not sure about: I will set up a server at a hosting facility, is it possible to install Samba on the server and access shares of this server over the internet? Would I just have to use the right workgroup, maybe restrict access to certain IP's, and would I then be able to access the shares from just anywhere on the internet, as long as I have the

...2.2.3 Problem description When changing the password of an existing user or adding a new user they can not logon from a WinXP Pro machine. Existing users can logon OK from WinXP Pro and Win98. New users, and those with password changed, can logon from a Win98 machine (smbclient \\\\server_name\\share_name -U user_name works OK). I have started an stopped samba but it makes no difference. Machine account added as follows: useradd -M -c "new_winxp_name" -s /bin/false -n new_winxp_name$ smbpasswd -a -m new_winxp_name$ registry key set to: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services...

...longer mount a particular remote share on the Linux box via smbmount. Oddly, however, I can still successfully connect to the share and manipulate its contents via smbclient. Does that make any sense? Here is how I'm running smbclient: (as any user: ) $ smbclient //<host.dns.name>/<share_name> -U <user_name> -W <workgroup> That works fine as long as I enter the correct password. On the other hand, I have tried a number of variations on the smbmount side, but none have succeeded. Here is an example that is as parallel to the above as I can come up with: (as root: ) $ s...

...have a home network with samba running on my gentoo machine. The samba share is visible to all my home machines (XP home edition and win95). My work laptop (win2000) however, does not show the share in the network neighborhood. When I try to connect to the share directly by typing \ \192.168.15.141\share_name in the run dialog win2000 displays the following message: "There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request". Is there any samba (or win2000) settings that I can alter to fix this problem? Piotr

I have configure this folder share in samba : [share_name] Path = /home/folder With this acc?s : share root:group_name 2770 In my group ?group_name?, I?ve user1, user2, user3. Therefore the 3 users have complete acces in this folder. But in this one I have to add other folder shared : - /home/folder/ufold1 - /home/folder/ufold2 But I want...

...the command now instead of directly to the shell. In other words I think Samba is issuing echo "hey there, hi there, hello" \> \/tmp\/hiya.txt My real world problem comes from simply trying to redirect a grep to /dev/null Something like this root preexec = /usr/bin/grep share_name /loginbats/%U/login.bat > /dev/null root preexec close = yes I can work around it apparently by just leaving off the > /dev/null, I guess Samba likely sends any output from a preexec to /dev/null anyway. So anyhow, is this new Samba 3.0.25 preexec behavior expected behavior? I could...

Hi, i've encountered a problem configuring the smb.conf... i must grant access i a share dir on a hp-ux server (11.11 with official HP samba 3.0.7 depot... maybe patch level to 3.0.14) i've write valid user = @group_name in [share_name] session of smb.conf We have just implemented the integration with the windows 2003 active directory domain for the validation using kerberos protocol... all work fine, but a group name (due to policy) is over 32 char... and, i've noticed that if i specify a group name length more than 32 cha...

...valid users = +GROUP1 +GROUP2 vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility = local7 full_audit:priority = NOTICE # Example share [SHARE_NAME] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> create mask = 0660 directory mask = 2770 force group = <FORCE_GROUP_NAME> path = <PATH> guest ok = no public = no writeable = yes valid users = +GROUP_1 +GROUP_2 vfs objects = full_audit acl_tdb full_audit:prefix...

> Lets hold off with logs, do you know that if you remove everything > that should be in a share from the [global] part of your smb.conf, you > get left with just '[global]’. The share actually comes from an include file. I made it look like it’s part of the main config for simplicity. > It also doesn't help that everything > that is in [global] is also in the share. It’s