Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "shardlock".
Did you mean:
hardlock
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] multithreaded performance disaster with -fprofile-instr-generate (contention on profile counters)
...hard[maxshard];
> atomic<int> shardmask;
>
> void inline inccounter(int idx)
> {
> int shardidx = gettid() & atomic_load(&shardmask, memory_order_consume);
> shard[shardidx][idx]++;
> }
>
> int pthread_create(...)
> {
> if (updateshardcount()) {
> shardlock();
> if (updateshardcount()) {
> int newcount = computeshardcount();
> for (int i = oldcount; i < newcount; i++)
> shard[i] = malloc(ncounter*sizeof(uint64));
> atomic_store(&shardmask, newcount-1, memory_order_release);
> }
> shardunlock();
> }
> ...
> }
>...
2014 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] multithreaded performance disaster with -fprofile-instr-generate (contention on profile counters)
...inccounter(int idx)
>>> {
>>> int shardidx = gettid() & atomic_load(&shardmask, memory_order_consume);
>>> shard[shardidx][idx]++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int pthread_create(...)
>>> {
>>> if (updateshardcount()) {
>>> shardlock();
>>> if (updateshardcount()) {
>>> int newcount = computeshardcount();
>>> for (int i = oldcount; i < newcount; i++)
>>> shard[i] = malloc(ncounter*sizeof(uint64));
>>> atomic_store(&shardmask, newcount-1, memory_order_release);
>>> }...
2014 Apr 18
4
[LLVMdev] multithreaded performance disaster with -fprofile-instr-generate (contention on profile counters)
On Apr 17, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes:
> > if (thread-ID != main's thread-ID && shard_count < std::min(MAX, NUMBER_OF_CORES)) {
> > shard_count = std::min(MAX,